Adaptive MIMO Equalizer with Constrained Coefficients

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-input multi-output (MIMO) channels face challenges in reliable data transmission due to inter-symbol interference (ISI), which existing equalization and detection methods struggle to fully address, particularly in scenarios where the target response is unknown, leading to trivial solutions and high implementation complexity.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive equalization scheme is employed using a generalized partial response (GPR) equalizer and data-dependent noise prediction soft-output Viterbi algorithm (DDNP-SOVA) detector, with constraints on the equalizer and whitening filter taps to avoid trivial solutions and simplify the adaptation process, including the use of LMS adaptation algorithms and minimization criteria to estimate coefficients and filter taps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing equalization and detection methods are used in MIMO channels, then implementation is straightforward, but inter-symbol interference cannot be fully addressed leading to trivial solutions when target response is unknown

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission reliabilityVSAvoidequalization and detection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter constraints by imposing specific constraints on equalizer coefficients and whitening filter taps. This transforms the unknown target response problem into a constrained optimization problem where the coefficients are estimated subject to constraints, avoiding trivial solutions while maintaining implementation feasibility through modified LMS adaptation algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-imposing constraints on the equalizer and whitening filter coefficients before the actual equalization and detection processes. These constraints are built into the adaptation algorithms from the start, guiding the coefficient estimation toward meaningful solutions rather than allowing trivial solutions to emerge during processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If adaptive equalization with unknown target response is performed without constraints, then flexibility is maintained, but trivial solutions occur and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal detection reliabilityVSAvoidequalization adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the parameter space by introducing constraints on equalizer coefficients and whitening filter taps. This changes the adaptation process from unconstrained to constrained optimization, where the LMS algorithms estimate coefficients subject to these constraints, thereby avoiding trivial solutions while maintaining adaptability to different MIMO channel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through the constrained adaptation algorithms where the estimated coefficients are continuously refined based on error signals while maintaining the imposed constraints. This feedback loop ensures that the equalizer adapts to channel conditions without deviating into trivial solutions, balancing reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If constrained coefficient estimation is performed, then trivial solutions are avoided and reliability improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit-error rate performanceVSAvoidcomputational power requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the computational approach by modifying the LMS adaptation algorithms to incorporate constraints directly into the coefficient update rules. This avoids the need for complex iterative optimization methods while still achieving constrained estimation, thereby improving bit-error rate performance without excessively increasing computational power requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs computationally efficient constrained adaptation algorithms that provide reliable performance without requiring heavy computational resources. The constrained LMS algorithms offer a practical balance between reliability improvement and computational cost, avoiding the need for more complex but power-intensive optimization methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS10148470B1Adaptive MIMO channel equalization and detection
Publication Date: 2018.12.04 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US10148470B1 patent drawing
  • US10148470B1 patent drawing
  • US10148470B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving a data signal over a multi-input multi-output (MIMO) channel. The method further includes equalizing the data signal, by an adaptive equalizer circuit having an associated target, to provide an equalized output of the data signal. As part of the method, taps of the equalizer circuit and coefficients of the target are estimated. A constraint is imposed on the coefficients of the target as part of the estimation of the coefficients of the target. A similar minimization process is used with constraint imposed on whitening filter taps associated with a DDNP detector in the MIMO channel.