MU-MIMO Grouping via Channel Variation and SINR Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) grouping methods fail to maximize downlink cell throughput due to the lack of consideration for wireless device channel variation rates and signal-to-noise ratios, leading to increased interference and reduced throughput, especially in scenarios with high mobility devices or low SNR.

Innovation Solution

A method that estimates channel variation coefficients and signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratios (SINR) to determine the information carrying capacity (ICC) of wireless devices, ensuring that only devices improving the ICC are added to MIMO groups, based on spatial separability and channel stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the number of paired wireless devices is increased to improve spectral efficiency, then spatial multiplexing capability is enhanced, but residual mutual interference increases and cell throughput may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell throughputVSAvoidmutual interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the grouping parameters from purely spatial metrics to include channel variation coefficients and SINR penalties. By dynamically adjusting the grouping based on channel conditions and interference characteristics, the system optimizes the number and composition of paired devices to maximize throughput while controlling interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where channel estimates from uplink reference symbols are used to compute channel variation coefficients. This feedback loop allows the system to adaptively adjust MU-MIMO groupings based on observed channel conditions, ensuring optimal performance while managing interference levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If uplink reference symbol transmission period is increased to reduce overhead, then system complexity is reduced, but channel estimate accuracy degrades leading to increased leakage interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereference symbol overheadVSAvoidchannel estimate accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computation of channel variation coefficients using available uplink reference symbols before downlink MU-MIMO transmission. By pre-characterizing the channel variation behavior, the system can compensate for longer reference symbol periods and maintain accurate channel estimates without increasing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces channel variation coefficients as an intermediary parameter that bridges the gap between sparse reference symbols and accurate channel estimation. These coefficients capture channel behavior between reference measurements, enabling accurate channel state information without frequent reference transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If spatial separation-based grouping is used to simplify device selection, then grouping complexity is reduced, but throughput is not maximized when high mobility or low SNR devices are included

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrouping algorithm complexityVSAvoiddownlink cell throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the grouping criteria beyond spatial separation by incorporating channel variation coefficients and SINR penalties. This multi-parameter approach maintains manageable complexity while significantly improving throughput by accounting for device mobility and channel conditions in the grouping decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240022291A1Channel state variation estimation and SINR penalty computation for MU-MIMO pairing
Publication Date: 2024.01.18 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20240022291A1 patent drawing
  • US20240022291A1 patent drawing
  • US20240022291A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one or more embodiments, a network node is provided. The network node includes processing circuitry configured to: determine a subset of a plurality of candidate wireless devices for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output, MIMO, grouping based at least on an information carrying capacity, ICC, of a MIMO transmission to the MIMO grouping; and cause the MIMO transmission to the MIMO grouping.