MIMO HARQ Identification During Multiplex-to-Diversity Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In MIMO transmission systems, changing from MIMO multiplex transmission to MIMO diversity transmission can lead to issues with process number overlap, causing errors in re-sending and synthesis, which disrupt communication when the number of transmission streams decreases.

Innovation Solution

A transmission controlling method that includes annexing data block identification information to each data block to prevent competitive identification between streams, allowing the receiver to correctly synthesize re-sent data blocks and maintain communication by delaying the decrease in stream number until unsent data is completed or wireless quality falls below a threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If MIMO multiplex transmission mode is used to increase transmission capacity, then transmission rate is improved, but when mode changes to MIMO diversity, process number overlap causes re-sending errors and communication disruption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission rateVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the identification space by dividing process numbers into separate ranges for different transmission modes (MIMO multiplex vs. MIMO diversity). This segmentation prevents overlap between process numbers from different modes, allowing the system to switch modes without causing re-sending errors. The receiver can correctly identify whether a received packet is a re-transmission or new data based on the segmented process number ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the number of transmission streams is decreased to improve wireless quality, then communication stability is improved, but process number competition between streams causes identification errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication stabilityVSAvoidstream identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different identification characteristics to different transmission scenarios. When the number of streams changes, the system locally adjusts the process number allocation strategy, ensuring that each stream or transmission mode has a unique identification pattern. This prevents identification errors even when stream count varies, maintaining both stability and accurate stream identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If mode change timing is delayed to ensure all unsent data is transmitted, then data completeness is improved, but transmission latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission completenessVSAvoidmode change latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-planning and announcing mode change timing to both sender and receiver before the actual mode transition occurs. This allows the system to prepare for mode changes in advance, ensuring that all necessary data is transmitted or acknowledged before the switch, while minimizing actual latency. The receiver can pre-allocate buffers and the sender can pre-clear transmission queues, achieving both completeness and low latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8601336B2Transmission controlling method, sender apparatus and receiver apparatus for wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2013.12.03 1FINITY INC
  • US8601336B2 patent drawing
  • US8601336B2 patent drawing
  • US8601336B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless communication system including a sender apparatus having a plurality of transmitting antennas that transmits a plurality of data blocks; and a receiver apparatus that receives the plurality of data blocks, wherein the sender apparatus transmits a process number via a control channel different from a data channel to the receiver apparatus, and wherein the receiver apparatus performs HARQ processing of received data blocks based on the received process number which prevents the data blocks from competing.