MIMO Interference Parameter Estimation via Logarithmic Approximation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In MIMO communication systems, existing methods for mitigating interference at cell-edges are hindered by the complexity of estimating interference parameters, particularly in scenarios where interfering signals from adjacent cells are strong, and current methods lack efficient algorithms for reducing computational complexity.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a method for estimating interference parameters using a processor that applies a logarithm function and a maximum-log approximation to a decision metric, allowing for the determination of transmit power, rank, precoding matrix, modulation order, and transmission scheme with reduced computational complexity, thereby enabling efficient interference cancellation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If maximum likelihood (ML) method is used to estimate interference parameters, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference parameter estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the interference parameter estimation process into distinct stages: receiving signals from multiple base stations, estimating channel responses, determining interference parameters (transmit power, modulation order, precoding matrix), and canceling interference. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces channel response estimation as an intermediary step between receiving signals and determining interference parameters. By first estimating channel responses and then using these responses to determine interference parameters, the system reduces the computational burden of direct ML estimation while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If blind detection method is used to estimate interference parameters, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic interference parameter estimationVSAvoidinterference parameter estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs an iterative feedback mechanism where the mobile terminal estimates interference parameters, cancels interference from received signals, re-estimates parameters, and refines the cancellation process. This feedback loop enables blind detection to converge to accurate parameter values without requiring explicit signaling, thus maintaining ease of operation while improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional signal processing methods with a systematic approach combining channel response estimation, decision-directed equalization, and iterative interference cancellation. This substitution of mechanical processing with intelligent algorithms enables accurate blind detection of interference parameters without requiring complex manual configuration or signaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10033482B2System and method for providing interference parameter estimation for multi-input multi-output (MIMO) communication system
Publication Date: 2018.07.24 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US10033482B2 patent drawing
  • US10033482B2 patent drawing
  • US10033482B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus are provided. The method includes receiving a desired signal from a serving base station, receiving a plurality of interfering signals from one or more base stations, estimating a maximum likelihood (ML) decision metric of interfering signals, applying a logarithm function to the ML decision metric, and applying a maximum-log approximation function to a serving data vector and an interference data vector, which are included in the ML decision metric, determining the values of a transmit power, a rank, a precoding matrix, a modulation order and a transmission scheme using the applied ML decision metric, and cancelling the interfering signals from the received signals using the determined values of transmit power, rank, precoding matrix, modulation order and transmission scheme.