MIMO Layer Selection for Latency and Spectral Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless networks face challenges in efficiently selecting between SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO configurations to optimize performance metrics such as latency, throughput, and spectral efficiency for diverse end devices in Next Generation (NG) wireless networks like 5G NR.

Innovation Solution

A MIMO selection service that identifies performance metric-sensitive end devices and selects the optimal MIMO configuration (SU-MIMO or MU-MIMO) based on layer comparisons and spectral efficiency calculations, recalculating configurations to maximize performance and spectral efficiency for both latency-sensitive and non-latency-sensitive devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If SU-MIMO configuration is used, then spectral efficiency is improved, but network capacity and user throughput are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidnetwork capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO configurations based on real-time channel conditions, device capabilities, and network load. The gNodeB evaluates channel state information, device mobility, and QoS requirements to adaptively select the optimal MIMO mode, resolving the contradiction between spectral efficiency and network capacity through dynamic adaptation rather than fixed configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by adjusting MIMO configuration settings based on channel conditions and device requirements. This includes modifying the number of active antennas, transmission modes, and resource allocation parameters to optimize both spectral efficiency and network capacity under different operating scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If MU-MIMO configuration is used, then network capacity is improved, but latency increases for performance-sensitive devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different MIMO configurations to different devices or device groups based on their specific requirements. Performance-sensitive devices receive SU-MIMO service with optimized latency parameters, while other devices benefit from MU-MIMO capacity enhancement, allowing each device to receive tailored service quality matching its needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts MIMO configuration based on real-time channel conditions and device priorities. When channel conditions are favorable and devices are stationary, MU-MIMO is activated for capacity enhancement. When mobility increases or latency becomes critical, the system switches to SU-MIMO to reduce processing overhead and latency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If MIMO configuration is recalculated frequently, then spectral efficiency is optimized, but system complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs MIMO configuration calculations periodically rather than continuously, evaluating channel conditions at scheduled intervals and triggering recalculation only when significant changes occur. This periodic evaluation approach maintains spectral efficiency optimization while reducing processing overhead and system complexity compared to continuous recalculation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20260101201A1Method and system for MIMO selection
Publication Date: 2026.04.09 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US20260101201A1 patent drawing
  • US20260101201A1 patent drawing
  • US20260101201A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, a network device, and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium are described in relation to an MIMO selection service. The MIMO selection service may include calculating MIMO configurations that include a number of layers for each MIMO configuration pertaining to a group of end devices; and identifying performance metric sensitive end devices of the group. The MIMO selection service may further include selecting for each performance metric sensitive end device, a first MIMO configuration from the MIMO configurations that has a higher number of layers relative to one or more other MIMO configurations of the MIMO configurations; and selecting for each non-performance metric sensitive end device of the group, a second MIMO configuration from the MIMO configurations that combined with the first MIMO configuration yield a highest spectral efficiency.