MU-MIMO Power Allocation via Utility Metric Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional MU-MIMO systems employ naive power allocation schemes that allocate equal transmission power to each user equipment (UE), which is inadequate for maximizing system performance due to interference and varying channel conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system that allocates downlink transmit power in a MU-MIMO system by identifying receivers, receiving channel state information, constructing a precoder, and deriving power-scale factors based on a utility function such as proportional fairness (PF) weighted sum rate, while applying power constraints to ensure optimal power distribution and reduce excessive transmit power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If equal transmission power is allocated to each UE, then the power allocation scheme is simple to implement, but the system throughput and spectral efficiency are not optimized due to interference and varying channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem throughputVSAvoidpower allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by deriving individual power-scale factors for each UE based on their specific channel conditions, utility function weights, and interference characteristics. Instead of uniform power allocation, each receiver receives customized power scaling that optimizes its individual performance while considering system-wide constraints, thereby improving overall throughput without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the power allocation parameter from fixed equal power to dynamic power-scale factors derived from utility function optimization. The power-scale factors are calculated based on channel state information, utility weights, and power constraints, allowing the system to adapt power distribution to varying channel conditions and user priorities, thus improving spectral efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If power-scale factors are derived to optimize utility function, then spectral efficiency is improved, but power constraint requirements may be violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidpower constraint satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by incorporating power constraint requirements directly into the utility function optimization process. Before power allocation is finalized, the system checks whether derived power-scale factors violate transmitter power constraints and adjusts them accordingly, preventing constraint violations rather than correcting them after the fact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the power allocation adaptive and iterative. The system derives power-scale factors based on current channel conditions and utility requirements, checks power constraints, and adjusts allocations dynamically. This allows the system to maintain reliability while optimizing spectral efficiency under varying conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If conventional naive power allocation is used, then implementation is straightforward, but interference management is inadequate and system performance is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidmulti-user interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by using channel state information (CSI) to derive power-scale factors. The system receives CSI from UEs, uses this feedback to calculate appropriate power allocations that account for current interference conditions, and adjusts power distribution accordingly. This closed-loop approach enables effective interference management while maintaining reasonable implementation complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9674801B2UE power allocation according to scheduler utility metric for DL MU-MIMO and DL CoMP
Publication Date: 2017.06.06 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US9674801B2 patent drawing
  • US9674801B2 patent drawing
  • US9674801B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is provided for allocating downlink transmit power in a wireless multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system. During operation, the system identifies a set of receivers for receiving signals from one or more transmitters on a same time-frequency slot, receives channel state information (CSI) for communication channels between the identified receivers and the transmitters, and constructs a precoder based on the CSI. The system further derives a set of power-scale factors for the precoder based on a utility function associated with the identified receivers such that the power-scale factors optimize the utility function. A respective power-scale factor scales power transmitted to a corresponding receiver.