MIMO Precoding with Channel Priority for Error-Rate Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

MIMO systems face challenges in achieving high signal-to-noise ratio and low error rates due to resource scarcity, particularly affecting certain users.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for MIMO signal processing that incorporates channel state information, including priority rankings, bit error rates, and noise levels to optimize resource allocation by precoding signals before transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If resources are allocated equally across all MIMO channels, then system complexity is reduced, but signal-to-noise ratio and error rate performance deteriorate for priority channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidresource allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allocating different resource levels to different channels based on their priority rankings. High-priority channels receive enhanced resources (more antenna ports, higher power allocation) while low-priority channels receive standard resources, creating localized quality improvements where needed rather than uniform allocation across all channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes resource allocation parameters (number of antenna ports, power allocation factors, precoding matrix indicators) based on channel priority rankings and quality requirements. This allows the system to adjust resource distribution parameters to meet specific signal-to-noise ratio and error rate targets for different channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If resources are increased for high-priority channels, then error rate performance improves, but overall system resource efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror rateVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource allocation where the resource distribution across channels changes based on real-time priority rankings and quality requirements. The system continuously adjusts the number of antenna ports, power allocation, and precoding parameters according to current channel conditions and priority levels, optimizing resource efficiency while meeting error rate targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by allocating enhanced resources only to channels that require them based on their priority and quality requirements, rather than uniformly increasing resources across all channels. This selective approach improves error rate performance for critical channels while maintaining resource efficiency for less critical channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If precoding incorporates channel priority and error rate requirements, then resource allocation efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidprecoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by determining channel priority rankings and quality requirements before performing precoding operations. The system pre-calculates the appropriate resource allocation parameters (antenna ports, power factors, precoding matrices) based on priority rankings, then applies these pre-determined parameters during precoding, improving efficiency while managing complexity through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where channel state information, priority rankings, and quality requirements are continuously monitored and used to adjust precoding parameters. This feedback loop allows the system to optimize resource allocation efficiency by adapting precoding operations based on actual channel conditions and priority requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12470269B2MIMO systems
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 BRITISH TELECOM PLC
  • US12470269B2 patent drawing
  • US12470269B2 patent drawing
  • US12470269B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of processing a plurality of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) signals for transmission over a plurality of communication channels can include precoding the plurality of signals prior to transmission, the precoding incorporating channel state information in relation to the plurality of communication channels, the precoding further incorporating: a priority ranking of a first channel of the plurality of communication channels relative to a second channel of the plurality of communication channels; and/or an error rate required by a channel of the plurality of communication channels; and/or an amount of noise experienced by a channel of the plurality of communication channels.