MIMO Precoding Vector Selection Reducing Signaling Overhead

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In MIMO communication networks, especially in MU-MIMO mode, existing technologies face challenges in managing interference and reinitializing transmission modes due to changes in secondary station positions or interference sources, leading to increased signaling requirements and reduced flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A method where the primary station selects a communication scheme and computes a transmission vector, while the secondary station computes a reception vector based on a predetermined scheme, allowing for flexible MIMO transmission and reducing signaling needs by enabling the primary station to change transmission modes without affecting the secondary station's post-processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the primary station uses a preferred precoding vector to maximize data rate, then the reachable data rate is improved, but interference with other secondary stations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata rateVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the primary station transmits reference signals to secondary stations, which then measure interference and report back to the primary station. This feedback loop enables the primary station to adjust precoding vectors to maximize data rate while controlling interference to other secondary stations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes precoding vector parameters based on channel state information and interference measurements. The primary station selects precoding vectors from a codebook and adjusts these parameters according to real-time channel conditions and interference reports from secondary stations, optimizing the trade-off between data rate and interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the transmission mode is reinitialized at every event (displacement or interference), then the system adapts to changes, but the signaling requirements increase hugely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem flexibilityVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation where the primary station continuously adjusts precoding vectors based on real-time channel state information and interference measurements, rather than reinitializing the entire transmission mode. This dynamic adjustment maintains system flexibility while avoiding the overhead of complete reinitialization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses preliminary channel state information measurement and interference reporting mechanisms that are continuously updated, allowing the system to adapt to changes without requiring complete reinitialization. The secondary stations continuously measure and report channel conditions, enabling proactive adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If the secondary station uses a predetermined communication scheme for post-processing, then the system complexity is reduced, but the ability to handle changing transmission modes is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepost-processing complexityVSAvoidtransmission mode flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the secondary station's post-processing to be universal and scheme-agnostic. The secondary station measures reference signals and reports channel state information without needing to know the specific transmission mode or precoding scheme used by the primary station. This universal approach reduces complexity while maintaining adaptability to different transmission modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9520924B2Method for communicating in a network
Publication Date: 2016.12.13 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US9520924B2 patent drawing
  • US9520924B2 patent drawing
  • US9520924B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for operating a communication system in a network, the system comprising a primary station and at least one secondary station, the primary station comprising a plurality of transmit antennas and the secondary station comprising a plurality of receive antennas, the method comprising the steps of the primary station selecting a first communication scheme among a plurality of communication schemes, the primary station computing a transmission vector on the basis of the first communication scheme, the secondary station computing a reception vector on the basis of a second communication scheme, the second communication scheme being selected among the plurality of communication schemes by the secondary station on the assumption that a predetermined communication scheme is being used by the primary station.