Low Complexity MIMO Receiver Scheduling for Collision Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Higher order MIMO systems face challenges in reducing uplink-downlink collisions, which degrade performance due to the complexity and cost of supporting multiple receiver chains, especially in devices where interference from adjacent channels is not filtered out.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for wireless communication that involves receiving a capabilities indicator from UEs with low-complexity diversity receivers and scheduling uplink and downlink transmissions to minimize collisions below a threshold, using processor-controlled scheduling based on the indicator to optimize transmission and power settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If higher order MIMO systems use multiple receiver chains to support diverse reception, then the system capacity and performance are improved, but the device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidreceiver chain complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the filtering function from the receiver chain, eliminating the need for complex filters in low-complexity diversity receivers. This allows the system to support multiple receiver chains without proportionally increasing device complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the receiver by operating without traditional filtering, allowing the system to achieve diverse reception capabilities with simplified receiver chains that have reduced complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If low-complexity diversity receivers are used to reduce device complexity, then the cost and complexity are reduced, but uplink-downlink collisions increase and degrade performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiver complexityVSAvoidperformance under collision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the base station receives capability indicators from UEs about their low-complexity receiver status, and the scheduler uses this feedback to adjust uplink-downlink scheduling decisions, thereby reducing collisions for UEs with low-complexity receivers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic scheduling that adapts to the capabilities of individual UEs. The base station dynamically adjusts the scheduling of uplink and downlink transmissions based on real-time capability indicators, making the system flexible enough to protect low-complexity receivers from harmful collisions while maintaining overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If traditional filtering is applied to remove adjacent channel interference, then the receiver performance is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference rejectionVSAvoidfilter complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the filtering function from the receiver chain entirely, demonstrating that traditional filters are not necessary for low-complexity diversity receivers. The system achieves adequate interference rejection without incorporating complex filtering hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, complex filtering hardware with a simpler, more cost-effective approach that uses scheduling and capability indication mechanisms instead of physical filters, significantly reducing device cost and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS10470200B2Low complexity higher order MIMO
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 QUALCOMM INC
  • US10470200B2 patent drawing
  • US10470200B2 patent drawing
  • US10470200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Low complexity, high order multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) operations are described in which a user equipment (UE), configured with at least one normal performance receiver chain and at least one low-performance, low-complexity diversity receiver chain, signals a capabilities indicator identifying existence of the low-performance diversity receivers. Using the UEs capabilities, a serving base station may schedule uplink and downlink transmissions for the UE to reduce uplink-downlink collisions below a minimum threshold number. The serving base station may also take UE transmit power into consideration for signaling power control or modulation and coding schemes in order to minimize potential interference cause by UE transmissions. For channel state feedback, the UE may provide different channel feedback for uplink-downlink collision subframes and non-collision subframes.