MIMO Signal Subgroup Splitting for Low-Complexity Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional detectors for user equipment in wireless communication networks face high complexity and poor performance, especially in large MIMO systems, due to the exponential complexity of Maximum Likelihood Detection (MLD) and sub-optimal performance of Linear Minimal Mean Square Error (LMMSE) receivers, which are exacerbated by varying channel conditions and modulation types.

Innovation Solution

A method and user equipment that split received MIMO signals into disjoint subgroups, allowing for simultaneous detection using MLD, with an intelligent splitting scheme based on achievable information data rates and interference cancellation, reducing computational complexity and improving performance through Log-Likelihood Ratio combination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If Maximum Likelihood Detection (MLD) is used for detecting transmitted signals in large MIMO systems, then detection performance is improved, but computational complexity increases exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection performanceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the transmitted signal into G disjoint subgroups, where each subgroup contains a subset of the total layers. By performing MLD separately on each subgroup rather than on all layers simultaneously, the exponential complexity is reduced from O(M^L) to G × O(M^(L/G)), where M is the modulation order and L is the number of layers. This segmentation allows the system to maintain good detection performance while making the computational complexity manageable for large MIMO systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If Linear Minimal Mean Square Error (LMMSE) receivers are used to reduce complexity, then computational complexity is reduced, but detection performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoiddetection performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the signal into subgroups and applying MLD to each subgroup. This hybrid approach combines the low complexity of group-based processing with the high performance of MLD, achieving a balance between complexity and performance that neither pure LMMSE nor full MLD can achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different detection strategies to different parts of the signal. By performing MLD on smaller subgroups rather than uniform processing of all layers, the system achieves locally optimized detection quality in each subgroup while maintaining overall system feasibility. This local quality approach allows MLD to be applied where it provides the most benefit without incurring the full exponential cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If the number of MIMO layers is increased to achieve high spectral efficiency, then data rate is improved, but detection complexity increases exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoiddetection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables support for a large number of MIMO layers by segmenting the detection process into G subgroups. This allows the system to scale to high spectral efficiency scenarios (e.g., 8×8 MIMO, 16×16 MIMO) without the detection complexity becoming prohibitive, as each subgroup processes fewer layers independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies MLD partially to each subgroup rather than to the entire signal. By performing MLD on subsets of layers (partial action) rather than all layers at once, the system achieves sufficient detection performance for each group while keeping the overall computational burden acceptable for large MIMO configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9118446B2Methods and user equipment in a wireless communication network
Publication Date: 2015.08.25 HONOR DEVICE CO LTD
  • US9118446B2 patent drawing
  • US9118446B2 patent drawing
  • US9118446B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A user equipment (UE) and a method are presented. The UE comprises a receiver unit and a processing circuit, and is configured for receiving wireless signals. The processing circuit is arranged for performing pre-detection of the received signals providing an initial estimation of transmitted signals. The processing circuit is also arranged for splitting the transmitted signal into disjoint subgroups, each one covering a subgroup of all layers used for the transmitted signal such that the subgroups together cover all the layers. The processing circuit is also arranged for interference cancellation performed on the subgroups of transmitted signals based on the initial estimation of the transmitted signals. The processing circuit is also arranged for detection of the subgroups of transmitted signals by utilization of an MLD algorithm, wherein the subgroup of layers within each one of the subgroups of transmitted signals is detected simultaneously.