MIMO Transmission Unit Selection for Capacity and Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In MIMO wireless communication systems, the transmission data capacity is reduced due to high spatial correlation between transmission and reception antennas, leading to error propagation and interference, especially in fading channels with low SINR, where existing techniques like V-BLAST struggle to optimize data streams and power allocation efficiently.

Innovation Solution

The proposed method involves determining transmission units with high channel quality, allocating power only to these units, and using reverse-ordering demodulation to select modulation and coding schemes, thereby concentrating power on fewer transmission units to maximize data capacity while minimizing calculations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If power is allocated to multiple transmission units in MIMO systems, then transmission diversity is improved, but transmission data capacity is reduced due to high spatial correlation and interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission diversityVSAvoidtransmission data capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and identifies transmission units with high channel quality from the set of all transmission units. By selecting only those units exceeding a quality threshold, the system concentrates power on favorable channels, avoiding the capacity loss caused by transmitting over correlated, low-quality channels. This extraction of high-quality transmission units resolves the contradiction by maintaining diversity through selective transmission while preserving data capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by allocating power non-uniformly across transmission units based on their individual channel quality. Instead of treating all transmission units equally, the system identifies and enhances transmission on units with superior channel conditions, thereby achieving both reliability through targeted diversity and productivity through efficient spectrum utilization in high-quality channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If successive symbol estimation and interference cancellation is used, then transmission data capacity is increased, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission data capacityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the set of transmission units into two groups: selected units with high channel quality and non-selected units with low channel quality. By processing only the selected units through successive symbol estimation and interference cancellation, the system achieves the capacity benefits of advanced signal processing while significantly reducing computational complexity by excluding poor-quality channels from intensive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by implementing successive symbol estimation and interference cancellation only on a subset of transmission units rather than all units. This selective application provides sufficient capacity enhancement through processing of high-quality channels while avoiding the excessive computational burden of processing all channels, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If reverse-ordering demodulation is used, then power allocation efficiency is improved, but modulation and coding scheme determination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower allocation efficiencyVSAvoidmodulation and coding scheme determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional demodulation order by processing transmission units in reverse order of their selection. Instead of determining MCS for all units then selecting, the system selects transmission units first based on channel quality, then determines MCS only for the selected units in reverse order. This inversion improves power allocation efficiency by concentrating power on high-quality channels while reducing overall MCS determination complexity through selective processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS7876848B2Apparatus and method for transmitting a data stream in a wireless communication system with multiple antennas
Publication Date: 2011.01.25 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US7876848B2 patent drawing
  • US7876848B2 patent drawing
  • US7876848B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method for determining a transmission unit for data stream transmission in a wireless communication system in which multiple transmission and reception antennas are used and a receiver provides information on a data stream to be transmitted through a transmission unit. A fading estimator calculates fading values from the multiple transmission antennas to the multiple reception antennas. A channel quality estimator reverse-orders combined weights for multiple transmission units based on the fading values from the multiple transmission antennas to the multiple reception antennas, successively selects transmission units for data stream transmission among the reverse-ordered transmission units, determines a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) for each of the selected transmission units, and feeds back the MCS to a transmitter.