Mind Map System for Bodily Imbalance Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying bodily imbalances using muscle response testing are inefficient due to the lack of a systematic approach, leading to improper questioning and unfamiliarity with potential problems, resulting in ineffective treatments.

Innovation Solution

A mind map system is introduced, categorizing imbalances into pathogenic, structural, nutritional, circuitry, toxic, and energetic imbalances with subcategories, presented in printed or electronic form, guiding practitioners to ask relevant questions and perform muscle response testing for accurate identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If muscle response testing is performed without a systematic approach, then the testing process is simple and quick, but the identification accuracy of bodily imbalances deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mind map system segments the complex diagnostic process into six distinct categories (pathogenic, structural, nutritional, circuitry, toxic, and energetic imbalances), each with specific subcategories and guiding questions. This segmentation allows practitioners to systematically navigate through potential imbalances without being overwhelmed by the complexity of the entire diagnostic process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mind map provides preliminary organization of diagnostic information before the actual muscle response testing begins. By pre-structuring the categories, subcategories, and guiding questions, the system prepares the practitioner with a systematic framework that enhances identification accuracy during the testing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If a comprehensive mind map system with six categories and subcategories is implemented, then identification accuracy improves, but the time required for diagnosis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoiddiagnosis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mind map system incorporates feedback mechanisms where each muscle response testing result guides the practitioner to the next relevant category or subcategory. This feedback loop allows the diagnostic process to adapt dynamically, focusing on the most likely imbalances first and reducing unnecessary testing time while maintaining high identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The systematic approach enables the diagnostic process to be dynamic rather than rigid. Practitioners can navigate through the mind map categories in a logical sequence but can also adapt the path based on patient symptoms and muscle response results, optimizing the diagnosis time while ensuring comprehensive coverage of potential imbalances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If practitioners rely on questioning without a structured system, then the interaction with patients is flexible and adaptive, but the completeness of imbalance identification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification completenessVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The mind map system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides a comprehensive framework for identifying all types of imbalances, guides the questioning process, structures the muscle response testing, and organizes the diagnostic results. This multi-functionality ensures complete identification of imbalances while maintaining ease of operation through its user-friendly structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mind map acts as an intermediary tool between the practitioner's knowledge and the diagnostic process. It mediates the interaction by providing structured guidance while allowing practitioner flexibility, ensuring that no critical imbalance category is overlooked while maintaining the natural flow of patient interaction and assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mind map system facilitates precise identification of bodily imbalances by providing a structured approach, enhancing the accuracy and effectiveness of muscle response testing, thereby improving treatment outcomes.

Implementation Method 1

Muscle response testing is a form of biofeedback that allows the treating physician to get responses from the subconscious mind of a patient. The treating physician usually asks the patient questions, then tests the patient's muscles for either a 'yes' or 'no' response, indicated, respectively, by either relative strength or weakness of the indicator muscle.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMuscle response testing (biofeedback):

Data Source

PatentUS9330240B2Method and system of identifying bodily imbalances
Publication Date: 2016.05.03 NELSON BRADLEY
  • US9330240B2 patent drawing
  • US9330240B2 patent drawing
  • US9330240B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a method of identifying bodily imbalances comprises presenting a mind map to a subject; asking the subject a question based on the mind map; performing muscle response testing; and, identifying the imbalance. The mind map may be presented in printed form, using an electronic means, or presented verbally. The mind map further comprises six (6) categories: pathogenic imbalances, structural imbalances, nutritional imbalances, circuitry imbalances, toxic imbalances, and energetic imbalances; and a series of subcategories within each category.