Mind Map Node Linking for Collaborative Task Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer systems for mind mapping and collaboration lack the tools and structures necessary for efficient and effective collaborative project planning and meeting management, failing to provide a synergistic system that combines the benefits of individual components.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based system that integrates mind mapping with project management, allowing for the creation, distribution, and tracking of tasks using a structured mind map with unique identifiers, and includes features for task scheduling, resource allocation, and integration with external project management systems, along with a meeting management module for optimizing meeting agendas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional mind mapping tools are used for collaborative project planning, then basic idea visualization is achieved, but the system lacks integrated task management and meeting management capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaborative project planning capabilityVSAvoidtask tracking information
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines mind mapping functionality with project management and meeting management systems into a single integrated platform. The mind map nodes are directly linked to task objects and meeting agenda items, allowing seamless transition between brainstorming and execution phases without information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates multi-functional nodes that can serve as both mind map concepts and task management objects simultaneously. Each node can contain ideas, tasks, subtasks, and meeting agenda items, making the system versatile for different project management needs while maintaining information integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If separate systems are used for mind mapping and project management, then each system can be simple, but the overall system complexity increases due to multiple tools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidcollaborative workflow
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges mind mapping, task management, and meeting management into a single unified system. Users interact with one interface that handles all project management activities, eliminating the need to switch between multiple applications and simplifying the overall workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs universal nodes that can function as mind map concepts, task containers, and meeting agenda items simultaneously. This multi-functionality reduces system complexity by eliminating redundant structures while maintaining ease of operation across different project management tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If manual task distribution is used in mind mapping, then flexibility is maintained, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask distribution efficiencyVSAvoidtask scheduling time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automatic task distribution functionality that allows mind map nodes to self-assign to team members based on predefined rules, availability, and skill matching. This automation eliminates manual intervention while maintaining flexibility, significantly reducing the time required for task scheduling and distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If traditional meeting agendas are used, then basic scheduling is achieved, but automatic optimization for time and resources is not provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeeting efficiencyVSAvoidmeeting preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The meeting management system automatically generates and optimizes meeting agendas by analyzing project tasks, resource availability, and time constraints. The system self-adjusts agenda items, timing, and resource allocation without manual intervention, improving meeting efficiency while reducing preparation time through automated optimization algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2776990A2System for collaboration and meeting management
Publication Date: 2014.09.17 MATCHWARE

AI summary

A computer hardware and software system provides a mind mapping system and method for meeting creation, management and collaboration. Each branch of a mind map created by a user may be assigned a unique identifier and each child branch extending from each branch may be assigned a unique child identifier, such that the unique child identifier includes a reference to the unique identifier of the branch from which the child branch extends. An input system may receive changes to parameters, determining if the changes should be made and rejecting changes for lack of permissions, as well as determining meeting schedules, breaks and arranging meeting topics based on inherent rules and rules input into the system. In one example, the system generates a meeting agenda from tasks created during mind mapping, automatic generation of a meeting agenda, automatic optimization of the meeting agenda, automatic conduct of a meeting and/or automatic generation of a dashboard including information obtained from the system and feedback entered by users after a meeting.