Cryptocurrency Miner Compute Engine Series Arrangement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The winner-takes-all compensation scheme in cryptocurrency mining leads to an arms race among miners, resulting in high costs and the formation of mining pools to share risks, but this approach is inefficient due to the all-or-nothing nature of block awards, which can lead to increased computational capacity and subsequent adjustments in difficulty, affecting the stability of block creation times.

Innovation Solution

A cryptocurrency mining system where compute engines are organized in series within compute boards, reducing the overall current required to power them, thereby minimizing IR drops and electromigration, and allowing for more efficient operation by distributing computational tasks across multiple compute engines, each powered in series rather than in parallel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If compute engines are powered in parallel to increase computational capacity, then processing power is improved, but current magnitude increases causing higher IR drops and electromigration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational capacityVSAvoidcompute engine reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the compute engines into multiple series-connected groups rather than connecting all engines in parallel. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high computational capacity through multiple groups while reducing the current burden on any single group, thereby minimizing IR drops and electromigration effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-dimensional parallel architecture to a multi-dimensional architecture combining series and parallel connections. By organizing compute engines in series-parallel configurations, the system achieves both high computational capacity (through parallel groups) and reduced current stress (through series connections within groups), effectively adding a new dimensional approach to system design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If more compute engines are added in parallel to handle increased difficulty, then computational capacity is improved, but system complexity and power distribution challenges increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational capacityVSAvoidpower distribution complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the compute engine array into multiple series-connected groups that can be independently powered. This segmentation simplifies power distribution by allowing each group to be managed separately, reducing the overall complexity compared to distributing power to numerous parallel-connected engines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of the conventional approach of connecting compute engines in parallel to simplify power distribution, the patent inverts the approach by using series connections. This inversion, while counterintuitive, actually simplifies the power distribution architecture by reducing the total current required and enabling more manageable power delivery to each series group.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Productivity

If compute engines operate at high current to maintain hash rate, then productivity is improved, but IR drops and electromigration reduce system reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehash rateVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a series-parallel architectural dimension that allows compute engines to operate at high power levels while distributing the current load across multiple series groups. This dimensional change enables maintaining high hash rates without subjecting individual engine groups to excessive current stress, thereby preserving system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces the magnitude of current supplied to compute engines, enhancing their reliability and performance, allowing for more stable and efficient cryptocurrency mining operations while maintaining the required computational capacity within the network.

Implementation Method 1

A cryptocurrency miner with current reducing compute engine arrangement... reducing the overall current required to power them, thereby minimizing IR drops and electromigration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Resistance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS20240329725A1Cryptocurrency miner with current reducing compute engine arrangement
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 CHAIN REACTION LTD
  • US20240329725A1 patent drawing
  • US20240329725A1 patent drawing
  • US20240329725A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cryptocurrency miner includes a power supply, a network interface, a compute module, and a controller. The compute module includes compute engine stories coupled in series with the power supply. Each compute engine story includes compute engines coupled in parallel between a voltage input node and voltage output node of the respective compute engine story. The controller receives, via the network interface, a job from a pool server of a mining pool and distributes aspects of the job to the compute engine stories.