Mini Oven Door Frame Structure for Dual-Axis Opening Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mini ovens with downward opening doors face challenges such as door protrusion, biased center of mass leading to instability, limited passage for shelf insertion and cooking state checking, and increased risk of toppling, especially when installed in narrow or low spaces.

Innovation Solution

A cooking appliance design featuring a door that opens both the front and top surfaces, with a door frame supporting a heating element and components like a reflector and protective grille, allowing for stable and easy installation, and providing an expanded passage for easier food or tray insertion/withdrawal, reducing the risk of toppling by shifting the center of mass rearward.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the door is opened downward to open the cooking compartment, then the cooking compartment can be accessed, but the door protrudes from the front and causes the center of mass to shift forward, increasing the risk of toppling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor opening accessVSAvoidappliance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The door is designed to open in two dimensions: it rotates downward to open the front surface and simultaneously rotates upward to open the upper surface. This dual-dimensional opening motion allows the door to clear the front projection problem while maintaining access to the cooking compartment, and the upward rotation component helps counterbalance the forward center of mass shift by redistributing weight during the opening sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If the door opens downward, then the cooking compartment is accessible, but the passage for shelf insertion and cooking state checking is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking compartment accessVSAvoidpassage area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By adding the upward rotation dimension to the door opening motion, the door creates an expanded passage that allows simultaneous access to both the front and upper portions of the cooking compartment. This enables easier shelf insertion from the front while also providing an upper passage for cooking state checking without requiring full door opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If the door opens downward, then the cooking compartment can be opened, but the door structure does not provide stable mounting for heating components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor opening functionVSAvoidcomponent mounting structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door assembly is segmented into multiple functional components: the door frame structure, the door panel, the heating element mounting brackets, the reflector panels, and the protective grille. This segmentation allows each component to be independently designed and mounted, with the door frame providing dedicated mounting surfaces for heating components without interfering with the downward opening function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The door assembly serves multiple functions: it provides the opening/closing function, acts as a structural frame for mounting heating components (heating element, reflector, grille), and contributes to the overall appliance stability. The door frame is designed as a multi-functional structure that simultaneously supports these diverse functions without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Volume of moving object

If mini ovens are made small in size, then they are more convenient for small spaces, but they are not suitable for cooking large size food and have limited cooking capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveappliance sizeVSAvoidcooking capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The door opening mechanism is designed to be dynamic and adaptive: during operation, the door can open downward to provide front access for small items, and the upward rotation component can extend the passage for inserting larger trays. This dynamic opening sequence allows the compact oven to adapt to different cooking needs, from small snacks to larger trays, without requiring a larger appliance footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances convenience and stability by allowing easy access and reduced risk of the appliance toppling forward, enabling the use of thicker, heavier trays for improved cooking performance, and facilitating maintenance with a stable and easily assembled component structure.

Implementation Method 1

a first heating part disposed at the door

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 2

heating the sealed space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

components like a reflector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11454401B2Cooking appliance
Publication Date: 2022.09.27 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US11454401B2 patent drawing
  • US11454401B2 patent drawing
  • US11454401B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cooking appliance includes a door frame that supports a heating part and is coupled to a door such that the heating part is disposed at the door.