MIOP@NodeB Predictive Failure Mitigation for Weather

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile network basestations, especially those in remote locations, are prone to failures due to harsh environmental conditions, leading to delays and service degradation, as existing systems wait for failures to occur before initiating recovery actions.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a predictive failure mechanism in the Mobile Internet Optimization Platform (MIOP)@NodeB appliance, which uses historical data, ambient environmental conditions, and weather forecasts to take preemptive actions and prevent partial or total equipment failure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the basestation operates in remote locations without predictive monitoring, then device complexity and cost are reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to weather-induced failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebasestation reliabilityVSAvoidpredictive failure mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by monitoring weather forecasts and environmental conditions before failures occur. When adverse weather is predicted, the system proactively redistributes traffic loads and activates backup basestations before the actual failure happens, thereby maintaining reliability without requiring complex real-time intervention mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops that continuously monitor weather conditions, basestation performance metrics, and traffic patterns. This feedback enables the predictive failure mechanism to detect early signs of potential failures and automatically trigger mitigation strategies, resolving the contradiction by making the system adaptive rather than statically complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If recovery actions are initiated only after failure occurs, then system complexity is minimized, but loss of time increases due to delayed service restoration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice downtimeVSAvoidpredictive monitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system takes preliminary actions by predicting failures based on weather data and performance trends before they occur. When a failure is predicted, traffic is redistributed and backup systems are activated in advance, reducing service downtime from hours to minutes while the complexity is managed through automated decision-making algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The predictive failure mechanism enables the basestation system to self-monitor, self-diagnose, and self-heal without human intervention. The system automatically detects potential failures, triggers mitigation protocols, and restores service, thereby reducing downtime while keeping operational complexity manageable through autonomous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Area of stationary object

If basestations are deployed in remote locations to expand network coverage, then service area is increased, but reliability worsens due to harsh environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coverage areaVSAvoidbasestation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by counteracting the harmful effects of harsh environmental conditions before they cause failures. Weather monitoring and predictive analytics detect adverse conditions early, triggering preventive measures such as traffic redistribution and backup activation, thereby maintaining reliability in remote locations without requiring physical protection of the basestations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Reliability

If manual monitoring and maintenance of basestations is performed, then reliability can be improved, but loss of time increases due to travel and response delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebasestation reliabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback monitoring of basestation performance, weather conditions, and traffic patterns. This real-time feedback enables automated detection of potential failures and immediate triggering of mitigation protocols, achieving high reliability with instantaneous response times without requiring manual monitoring and maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The predictive failure mechanism enables basestations to self-monitor their own health status and automatically initiate recovery protocols when problems are detected. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual monitoring and maintenance, achieving both high reliability and zero response delay through autonomous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9693241B2Mitigating effects of predicted failures in a mobile network basestation due to weather
Publication Date: 2017.06.27 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9693241B2 patent drawing
  • US9693241B2 patent drawing
  • US9693241B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Basestation equipment in a mobile data network is subject to harsh environmental conditions at many remote locations. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has introduced a Mobile Internet Optimization Platform (MIOP) appliance, referred herein as the MIOP@NodeB. This appliance is placed at the edge or basestation of a mobile data network to provide a platform for hosting applications and enhancing mobile network services. The introduction of an edge appliance provides a platform for additional reliability functions. A predictive failure mechanism in the basestation appliance mitigates the effects of predicted failures in a mobile network basestation due to weather conditions. The predictive failure mechanism considers historical data, ambient environmental conditions, weather alerts and weather forecasts to take pre-emptive action to avert partial or total failure of the basestation equipment.