Molecular Imprinted Polymer Binding Capacity via Affinity Purification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for preparing molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs) fail to achieve high binding capacity and specificity, making them unsuitable for clinical use as alternatives to antibodies and soluble receptors, particularly in pharmaceutical applications where target molecule clearance is relevant.

Innovation Solution

A method involving affinity purification and micronization of MIP particles to enhance their binding capacity and specificity, where MIPs are sorted based on their ability to bind a target molecule or template, and then combined with a carrier or vehicle to create a composition with improved affinity and capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional MIP preparation methods are used, then the process is simple and straightforward, but the binding capacity and specificity are insufficient for clinical use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding capacity and specificityVSAvoidpreparation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the MIP preparation process into distinct segments: initial polymerization, micronization to reduce particle size, and affinity purification to separate high-affinity binders from low-affinity ones. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently, improving overall binding capacity and specificity while making the complex process more manageable and reproducible

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by optimizing particle size through micronization and selecting specific elution conditions during affinity purification. By controlling particle size distribution and using gradient elution with increasing solvent strength, the method enhances binding capacity and specificity, transforming conventional MIPs into clinically viable therapeutics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If MIP particles are not micronized, then the polymer structure remains intact, but the binding sites are not accessible and template removal is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemplate removal efficiency and binding site accessibilityVSAvoidpolymer structure integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial micronization rather than complete degradation of the polymer structure. By reducing particle size to a specific range (1-50 μm), the method achieves sufficient template removal efficiency and binding site accessibility while preserving the structural integrity needed for maintaining binding capacity. This partial action avoids over-processing that would destroy the polymer framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If all MIP particles are used without purification, then the process is efficient, but low-affinity and non-binding particles reduce overall binding capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall binding capacityVSAvoidpreparation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes low-affinity and non-binding MIP particles from the mixture through affinity purification. By using template molecules or analogs as eluents, the method selectively elutes high-affinity binders while leaving low-affinity particles in the column, thereby concentrating the active binding sites and significantly improving overall binding capacity of the final product

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method significantly increases the binding capacity and specificity of MIPs, allowing them to be used effectively in pharmaceutical applications, such as treating cardiovascular diseases and gastrointestinal tract-related conditions, by concentrating high-affinity binding sites and optimizing particle size for enhanced performance.

Implementation Method 1

MIPs are sorted based on their ability to bind a target molecule or template

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAffinity binding: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 2

subjecting the suspended MIPs to an affinity purification procedure, wherein the template molecule or a fragment thereof or a mimic thereof is used as capture agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAffinity purification: Chromatography

Data Source

PatentEP1988993B1Improved preparation of molecular imprinted polymers
Publication Date: 2019.04.17 MIPSALUS APS
  • EP1988993B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1988993B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP1988993B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

One aspect is a method for improved preparation of molecular imprinted polymer (MIP) particles, where initial compositions comprising insoluble MIP particles are enriched for those MIP particles that bind a particular target molecule, thus excluding non-binding and weakly binding particles from the final composition. Enrichment is typically accomplished via use of chromatographic methods capable of separating particulate material or by means of agglutination. Another aspect is preparation of improved insoluble MIPs by use of extended micronization of raw MIP particles with a view to expose a large number of binding sites per mass unit of MIP particles. In preferred embodiments the two aspects are combined. The resulting improved MIPs may be used for diagnostic, analytical and therapeutic purposes, notably as orally administered drugs which can bind substances such as cholesterol and bile acids and bile acid salts in the gastrointestinal tract.