Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Using Smart Templates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current molecularly imprinted polymers face challenges such as heterogeneous binding sites, template occlusion, and scalability issues, leading to low yield and high costs in producing polymers with specific affinity for targets, particularly in industrial-scale applications.

Innovation Solution

The development of nanosized multifunctional placeholder templates allows for the production of molecularly imprinted polymers as nano- or micro-particles with enhanced affinity, enabling template-free form, scalable process, and efficient recycling, along with parallel synthesis capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional molecular imprinting is used with highly cross-linked organic polymers, then binding sites are formed, but heterogeneous distribution of binding sites occurs leading to strong dependence of selectivity and binding uptake on sample load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding site uniformityVSAvoidbinding uptake consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the polymerization process into discrete temporal stages: template binding phase, polymerization phase, and template removal phase. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each phase to achieve uniform binding site distribution while maintaining high binding capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The template is bound to the monomer mixture before polymerization begins, ensuring that templates are positioned and secured in advance. This preliminary action prevents template displacement during polymerization and ensures uniform distribution of binding sites throughout the polymer matrix.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If template is added to monomer mixture for imprinting, then binding sites are formed, but template occlusion occurs resulting in bleeding and requiring multiple purification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding site formationVSAvoidtemplate recovery process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The template is selectively removed from the polymer matrix through a dedicated template removal phase using selective solvents or chemical treatments. This extraction step separates the template from the polymer product, eliminating occlusion issues and simplifying purification while maintaining binding site integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The template is discarded from the final polymer product through controlled removal, and the process is designed to prevent template recovery requirements. The polymerization and removal steps are optimized to ensure complete template elimination without needing subsequent purification steps, reducing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Reliability

If multiple MIPs need to be synthesized and screened for optimization, then right MIP is found, but process scalability and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMIP selection qualityVSAvoidsynthesis efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a universal imprinting protocol that can be applied to multiple different templates using the same core process parameters and material system. This multi-functionality allows parallel synthesis of different MIPs with consistent quality, improving scalability while maintaining selection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses an excess of template in the monomer mixture to ensure complete coverage of binding sites, even when optimizing for specific selectivity. This excessive action ensures that sufficient binding sites are formed for each MIP variant, allowing efficient screening of multiple candidates without compromising quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in high-yield, template-free molecularly imprinted polymers with improved affinity and accessibility, overcoming previous limitations of heterogeneity, occlusion, and scalability, facilitating practical and economic industrial applications.

Implementation Method 1

Molecular imprinting refers to a templating technique for producing inverse replicas of individual molecules in network polymer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMolecular imprinting:

Implementation Method 2

Free radical polymerization of functional vinyl monomers with an excess of cross-linking divinyl monomers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCross-linking: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

Subsequent removal of the template results in a porous organic polymer material equipped with binding sites for the template ion or molecule

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPore formation: Porosity

Data Source

PatentUS10435486B2Polymers prepared using smart templates
Publication Date: 2019.10.08 SELLERGREN BOERJE
  • US10435486B2 patent drawing
  • US10435486B2 patent drawing
  • US10435486B2 patent drawing

AI summary

New molecularly imprinted polymers are described, and a method for their production using novel particle technology based on multifunctional placeholder templates.