Mirror

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing kitchen and bathroom devices lack the ability to provide personalized services based on user identity and context, leading to inefficient operation and limited customization.

Innovation Solution

A system of interconnected intelligent devices that collect and analyze sensor data to determine user identity and preferences, allowing for customized operation of connected appliances through a home hub communication device and mobile application, enabling personalized settings and functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If household appliances operate with fixed functions and settings, then device complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but adaptability to different users and contexts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the personalization function into separate modules: sensor data collection by first appliance, data transmission through communication interface, identity determination by controller, and service execution by second appliance. This modular segmentation enables adaptability without requiring complete system redesign for each user scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller is designed with universal functionality to determine various user identities from different sensor data types (biometric, behavioral, contextual) and to coordinate multiple different appliances (kitchen and bathroom devices). This multi-functional design achieves adaptability across diverse users and devices without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If appliances collect and process sensor data to determine user identity, then service quality and user experience are improved, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting and pre-processing sensor data in the background before user interaction is needed. The controller maintains ready-to-use user identity information, so when service is required, the data is already prepared and can be quickly retrieved without intensive real-time processing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The communication interface acts as an intermediary that efficiently transmits sensor data between appliances and the controller. This dedicated data transmission channel streamlines the data flow, reducing processing bottlenecks and enabling faster identity determination while maintaining service accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If standardized data exchange protocols are implemented across appliances, then interoperability and network efficiency are improved, but implementation complexity and standardization requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork efficiencyVSAvoidstandardization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The standardized communication interface is designed to operate autonomously, automatically formatting and transmitting sensor data without requiring complex manual configuration or intervention. The system self-adapts to different data types and appliance combinations, reducing the burden of standardization implementation while maintaining high network efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple sensors and connected devices are integrated to provide personalized services, then service functionality and user customization are improved, but system reliability and security requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice customizationVSAvoidsystem security
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The controller implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor sensor data quality, device communication status, and user service delivery. This feedback loop enables real-time detection and correction of potential security issues or data anomalies, maintaining system reliability and security while supporting extensive service customization across multiple connected devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10448762B2Mirror
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 KOHLER CO(US)
  • US10448762B2 patent drawing
  • US10448762B2 patent drawing
  • US10448762B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mirror assembly includes a mirror substrate, a sensor, and a controller. The mirror substrate is configured to provide a reflection of objects including a user. The sensor is configured to collect sensor data from the user. The controller is configured to analyze the sensor data and select an auxiliary command for an auxiliary device coordinated with the mirror assembly. The auxiliary command is selected for the user.