Motor Vehicle Mirror Jet Flow Control for Drag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

External side view mirrors on motor vehicles create significant aerodynamic drag and noise due to their shape, leading to increased fuel consumption and reduced fuel efficiency, particularly in smaller vehicles, as they protrude into the oncoming airflow and cause vortex shedding and turbulent pressure fluctuations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a low drag low noise device that uses passive jet flow control to create directed jets of air around the rear of the mirror, mimicking a virtual trailing edge or 'boat-tail' to counteract base flow and reduce vortex shedding, thereby minimizing drag and noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If external side view mirrors are used for vehicle operation, then the driver can observe side and rear traffic conditions, but the mirror creates significant aerodynamic drag and noise that reduces fuel efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver observation capabilityVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the mirror by adding a tapered rear section that transitions from the mirror housing to a smaller diameter end. This parameter change creates a more aerodynamic shape that reduces drag while maintaining the mirror's observational function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies curvature by designing the mirror with a tapered, rounded rear section instead of flat or sharp edges. This spheroidal transition reduces flow separation and vortex shedding, thereby reducing drag and noise while preserving the mirror's utility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional flat-backed mirror shapes are used, then manufacturing is simple, but vortex shedding and turbulent pressure fluctuations create high drag and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemirror fabrication simplicityVSAvoidvortex shedding and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the flat back surface with a tapered, curved surface that smoothly transitions to a rounded end. This curvature eliminates sharp edges that cause flow separation and vortex shedding, reducing harmful aerodynamic effects while remaining manufacturable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of adding complex active flow control systems to reduce drag, the patent inverts the approach by modifying the passive geometry of the mirror itself. The tapered shape inherently reduces vortex shedding without requiring additional active components, simplifying the overall system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Device complexity

If the mirror has a streamlined front surface but abruptly terminates in a flat back, then the mirror structure is simple, but base flow conditions create high drag forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemirror structure complexityVSAvoidaerodynamic drag force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the mirror structure into distinct zones: a streamlined front section for observational function and a tapered rear section for aerodynamic performance. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tapered rear section uses curved, spheroidal geometry to smoothly guide flow around the mirror and reduce base flow effects. This curvature eliminates abrupt terminations that cause flow separation and high drag, while adding minimal complexity to the overall structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively reduces both drag and noise by altering the airflow around the mirror, enhancing fuel efficiency and reducing the deceleration of smaller vehicles, while also increasing base pressure and minimizing vortex shedding.

Implementation Method 1

uses passive jet flow control to create directed jets of air around the rear of the mirror

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJet flow control: Jet

Implementation Method 2

reduce vortex shedding, thereby minimizing drag and noise

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex shedding: Kármán Vortex Street

Implementation Method 3

high turbulent pressure fluctuations and vortex shedding create drag, noise

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulent pressure fluctuations: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS9211839B2Low drag low noise devices using jet flow control
Publication Date: 2015.12.15 DIALECTIC FLOW TECH
  • US9211839B2 patent drawing
  • US9211839B2 patent drawing
  • US9211839B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Low drag low noise devices are described herein that use passive jet flow control to reduce the drag and noise created by devices (e.g., motor vehicle side view mirrors) while the devices travel through fluid. The low drag low noise devices described herein comprise a lengthwise axis, an outer body, and an inner body. The outer body and the inner body cooperatively define a channel through which fluid can pass during use.