Misalignment Detection in Semiconductor Probe Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In semiconductor testing, misalignment issues between probes and bondpads or socket contacts can lead to degraded electrical signal integrity, mechanical damage, and increased manufacturing costs due to yield loss and the need for special handling and maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for identifying suspected misaligned probes or socket contacts through analysis of parametric test measurements and spatial analysis to determine position attributes, allowing for the evaluation of misalignment indication conditions and providing alerts for potential misalignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If alignment monitoring is performed using traditional methods, then misalignment can be detected, but the detection precision is insufficient to identify suspected misaligned probes early enough to prevent damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemisalignment detection precisionVSAvoidtime to detect misalignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of parametric test measurements to identify suspected misaligned probes before actual misalignment damage occurs. By examining test data patterns and spatial relationships during normal operation, the system detects alignment issues in their early stages, enabling preventive action before signal degradation or mechanical damage happens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces traditional mechanical alignment monitoring methods with an electronic/data-driven approach. Instead of relying on physical alignment checks, the system uses analysis of parametric test measurements and spatial analysis to digitally identify misaligned probes, achieving higher precision and earlier detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If no alignment monitoring system is used, then the testing process is simpler and faster, but misalignment issues go undetected causing signal degradation and yield loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting throughputVSAvoidelectrical signal integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the existing test data collected during normal wafer testing to automatically identify misaligned probes. The parametric test measurements and spatial analysis are performed on data already generated by the testing process, allowing the system to monitor alignment without adding significant overhead to the testing throughput while maintaining signal integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If traditional alignment detection methods are used, then the system complexity remains low, but the ability to identify and correct misalignment issues is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment monitoring system complexityVSAvoidprobe alignment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The alignment monitoring function is segmented into distinct analytical components: examination of test data collections, analysis of parametric test measurements, spatial analysis to determine position attributes, and evaluation of misalignment indication conditions. This modular approach enables high precision alignment detection while keeping the overall system complexity manageable through clear functional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8838408B2Misalignment indication decision system and method
Publication Date: 2014.09.16 OPTIMAL PLUS
  • US8838408B2 patent drawing
  • US8838408B2 patent drawing
  • US8838408B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for deciding whether or not to indicate misalignment. In some examples, an analysis of parametric data relating to tests sensitive to misalignment is performed in order to determine which data is incongruous and to identify corresponding probes or socket contacts as suspected misaligned. In some examples, additionally or alternatively, a spatial analysis quantifies the placement of a set of identified suspected misaligned probes, which were identified from pass/fail test data and/or parametric test data, with respect to a contiguous or non-contiguous area on one or more wafers.