Onboard Missile Guidance via Real-Time Flight Path Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surface-to-air missile guidance systems rely on uplink communication, which can fail, leading to course corrections being unavailable, especially with longer-range missiles, resulting in potential misses or unnecessary destruction.

Innovation Solution

An onboard computer system that numerically simulates the missile's flight path in real time using a 3-degree-of-freedom model to adjust the aim point and intercept point iteratively, accounting for variations in rocket motor performance, allowing for autonomous course corrections and serving as a backup to remote guidance systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If uplink communication is used for missile guidance, then centralized control and coordination are improved, but system reliability deteriorates due to communication failure risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized controlVSAvoidguidance availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The missile's onboard computer autonomously calculates its own flight path, impact point, and course corrections without requiring continuous external guidance. The system serves itself by using onboard sensors and an iterative numerical simulation process to determine guidance commands independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The onboard computer pre-calculates multiple potential flight paths and impact points before communication failure occurs. By having guidance algorithms and simulation models ready in advance, the missile can immediately switch to autonomous operation without interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If individualized guidance is provided for each missile, then guidance accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance accuracyVSAvoidtracking and calculation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each missile carries its own guidance computer that independently calculates individualized flight paths based on its specific rocket motor characteristics. This eliminates the need for complex external tracking and calculation systems, as each missile performs its own guidance computations autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical tracking systems with onboard numerical simulations. The iterative calculation process uses mathematical models to substitute for physical tracking infrastructure, reducing system complexity while maintaining individualized guidance accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If computational resources are increased for more accurate simulation, then aim point precision is improved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaim point precisionVSAvoidonboard computing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs iterative calculations only to the extent necessary to achieve convergence within acceptable error margins. The numerical simulation continues iterating until the aim point stabilizes, performing just enough computation to achieve required precision without excessive resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The iterative process dynamically adjusts computational parameters, refining the aim point calculation step-by-step. By changing parameters incrementally and stopping when convergence criteria are met, the system achieves high precision without requiring maximum computational resources from the start.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP1999528B1Onboard guidance method for powered ballistic missiles
Publication Date: 2017.08.30 RAYTHEON CO
  • EP1999528B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1999528B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1999528B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A guidance method for a powered ballistic missile (10) involves using an onboard computer to numerically simulate the flight path of the missile in real time, using a model with at least 3 degrees of freedom. The results of this simulation are used to update in real time an aim point and/or a predicted intercept point. An iterative process may be used in adjusting the aim point and/or the predicted intercept point. The process may be carried out until a specified number of steps have been completed, and/or until a specified heading error threshold of the aim point and a specified time of flight threshold have been achieved. The use of real time updating of an aim point of the missile advantageously takes into account variations in missile velocity and position due to individual variations in the rocket motor of the missile.