Missile Shroud Separation via Aerodynamic Retainer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need to protect powered missiles from damage during and after launch, and to ensure the separation of missile shrouds during flight without relying on active mechanisms, which can fail.

Innovation Solution

A detachable missile shroud with two or more separable parts held together by a retainer that separates passively during flight due to aerodynamic forces, protecting the seeker and other components from debris and allowing the seeker to function through a front window.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a shroud is used to protect the missile nose portion, then protection from debris and exhaust gases is improved, but the shroud must be separated during flight which adds complexity to the separation mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from debris and exhaust gasesVSAvoidseparation mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shroud separation mechanism uses self-service by relying on aerodynamic forces generated during missile flight to automatically separate the shroud from the missile nose portion. The retainer structure is designed with breakable elements that fail under aerodynamic loading, eliminating the need for active separation systems such as motors, sensors, or control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The protective function is extracted from a permanent structure by using a detachable shroud that can be removed from the missile nose portion. The shroud is designed as a separate component that can be easily detached through the breakable retainer mechanism, allowing the protective function to be applied only when needed during launch and initial flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If active mechanisms are used to separate the shroud, then separation control is improved, but reliability decreases due to potential mechanism failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation controlVSAvoidseparation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The separation system performs self-service by using the missile's own aerodynamic forces to separate the shroud. The breakable retainer elements are designed to fail at predetermined points under aerodynamic loading, creating a passive but reliable separation mechanism that does not depend on active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The aerodynamic forces that could potentially harm the missile during flight are converted into a beneficial separation mechanism. The same airflow that provides lift and thrust also generates the forces needed to break the retainer elements and separate the shroud, turning a potential source of stress into a useful separation function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the shroud remains attached during flight, then protection is maintained, but aerodynamic performance deteriorates due to drag and interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection during flightVSAvoidaerodynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The shroud system transitions from a static attached state to a dynamic separated state during flight. The retainer mechanism is designed to maintain the shroud attached during launch when protection is critical, then automatically separate during flight when aerodynamic performance becomes the priority, creating a dynamic adaptation to changing flight conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The shroud attachment status changes periodically during the missile's flight profile - attached during launch and initial phase when protection is needed, then separated during sustained flight when aerodynamic efficiency is prioritized. This periodic transition optimizes both protection and performance at different flight stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The shroud effectively protects the missile components during launch and initial flight, ensuring reliable separation without active mechanisms, thus preventing damage from exhaust gases and debris, and allowing the seeker to operate effectively.

Implementation Method 1

The shroud detaches from the missile during flight of the missile, due to action of aerodynamic forces on the shroud

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic forces: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS8519312B1Missile with shroud that separates in flight
Publication Date: 2013.08.27 RAYTHEON CO
  • US8519312B1 patent drawing
  • US8519312B1 patent drawing
  • US8519312B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A missile includes a separable shroud that covers a nose portion of the fuselage of the missile. The shroud covers and protects a seeker window and a seeker at the nose of the missile. The shroud is configured to remain coupled to the missile during and immediately after launch of the missile, and to separate during flight under the action of aerodynamic forces. Toward that end parts of the shroud are initially coupled together by a retainer, which allows the parts to separate during flight. The retainer may include one or more tension bands that break at a certain tension, and/or one or more weakened parts of the shroud, which break during flight. Parts of the shroud may include inward protrusions that make contact with an ogive portion of the nose of the fuselage.