Mistuned Rotor Blade Shaping for Flutter Frequency Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Compressor rotors in gas turbine engines experience aerodynamic instabilities such as stall flutter and supersonic flutter, which can lead to undesirable stress loads due to blades vibrating at frequencies close to their natural frequencies.

Innovation Solution

Modify the shape of alternating blades in a rotor by creating a recessed area on one type of blade to increase the difference in natural vibration frequencies between adjacent blades, ensuring they differ by a threshold amount.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If all blades in the rotor have identical shapes, then manufacturing is simplified and cost is reduced, but natural vibration frequencies of adjacent blades become too close, increasing the risk of flutter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidflutter resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing geometric modifications (recesses or material removal) only in specific zones of selected blades, rather than modifying all blades uniformly. This localized modification changes the natural vibration frequencies of specific blades to create sufficient frequency separation, while leaving other blades unchanged, thus maintaining manufacturing simplicity for the majority of blades while achieving flutter protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetry by creating geometric differences between alternating blades (first blades vs. second blades). The modified blades have different shapes from the unmodified blades, creating intentional frequency mistuning. This asymmetric design ensures that adjacent blades have sufficiently different natural vibration frequencies, preventing synchronous vibration and flutter while requiring modifications to only alternating blades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If the natural vibration frequencies of adjacent blades are made very different, then flutter is prevented, but the rotor becomes more sensitive to unbalance and vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflutter resistanceVSAvoidrotor vibration stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by modifying only alternating blades (first blades or second blades) rather than all blades. This creates a balanced mistuning pattern where frequency differences exist between adjacent blades, but the overall rotor maintains symmetry and balance. The partial modification approach prevents flutter while minimizing the introduction of unbalance and excessive vibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If blade shapes are modified to achieve frequency separation, then flutter protection is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflutter protectionVSAvoidblade geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent minimizes geometric complexity by confining modifications to localized zones on the blade surface, such as recesses or material removal in specific regions. These localized changes achieve the required frequency separation without requiring complex overall blade redesign, thus limiting the increase in manufacturing complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent reduces manufacturing complexity by modifying only alternating blades rather than all blades. This partial modification approach achieves the necessary frequency mistuning for flutter protection while significantly reducing the total number of modified components, tooling requirements, and manufacturing steps compared to modifying every blade.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents flutter by ensuring sufficient frequency separation, preventing potential damage from supersonic flutter and maintaining rotor stability.

Implementation Method 1

natural vibration frequencies of the first blades different from natural vibration frequencies of the second blades

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS12385400B2Method of manufacturing a mistuned rotor
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US12385400B2 patent drawing
  • US12385400B2 patent drawing
  • US12385400B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes: obtaining a rotor having a hub and a plurality of blades protruding from the hub, the plurality of blades including first blades and second blades disposed in alternation around a central axis of the rotor, natural vibration frequencies of the first blades different from natural vibration frequencies of the second blades; determining that a difference between a first natural vibration frequency of a first blade of the first blades and a second natural vibration frequency of a second blade of the second blades is below a threshold; and modifying a shape of the first blade until the difference between the first natural vibration frequency and the second natural vibration frequency is at or above the threshold.