Miter Fence Positioning With Visual Ruler Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor-driven positioning systems for miter saws require encoders or feedback devices to accurately position stop surfaces, adding complexity and cost to the automated repositioning process.

Innovation Solution

A positioning mechanism using a rotary motor with incremental control, a visual sensor, and a ruler strip with position indicators to determine the position of the stop surface without the need for an encoder, allowing for precise and repeatable positioning of the stop surface relative to the cutting axis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If an encoder or feedback device is used to accurately position the stop surface, then positioning precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the encoder/feedback device from the positioning system. Instead of using complex feedback mechanisms, the invention uses a simple ruler strip with position indicators that can be visually detected, eliminating the need for encoders and their associated complexity while maintaining positioning accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a visual copy of position information through the ruler strip with position indicators. Rather than using electronic feedback from an encoder, the system uses visual markings that replicate position data, allowing the controller to determine position through image processing of these visual indicators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If an encoder or feedback device is used to accurately position the stop surface, then positioning precision is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive electronic feedback devices with inexpensive visual indicators on a ruler strip. The position indicators are simple visual markers that can be manufactured at low cost, eliminating the need for costly encoders and feedback electronics while maintaining positioning precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses visual copies of position information through ruler markings instead of expensive electronic sensors. The ruler strip with position indicators provides a low-cost alternative to encoder feedback, allowing the system to determine position through image processing rather than expensive electronic measurement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If a motor-driven system with encoder feedback is used, then automated repositioning accuracy is improved, but control scheme complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated repositioning accuracyVSAvoidcontrol scheme complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the feedback component from the control system. Instead of using encoder feedback loops, the invention uses open-loop control where the controller sends commands to the motor and determines position independently through visual detection of ruler indicators, eliminating complex feedback control schemes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary visual detection system between the motor and controller. The ruler strip with position indicators serves as an intermediary that provides position information to the controller through visual detection, replacing the direct electronic feedback path of an encoder and simplifying the control architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces complexity and cost by eliminating the need for feedback devices, enabling precise and repeatable positioning of the stop surface while maintaining accuracy and efficiency in the automated repositioning process.

Implementation Method 1

a position detection system comprising a visual sensor coupled to the stop mechanism and a ruler strip. The ruler strip includes a plurality of spaced apart position indicators configured for detection by the visual sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Light

Data Source

PatentUS11312037B2Miter fence positioner
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 OWENS TIMOTHY
  • US11312037B2 patent drawing
  • US11312037B2 patent drawing
  • US11312037B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A miter saw assembly includes a cutting tool configured to perform a cut along a cutting axis. A stop mechanism is linearly translatable in a first direction. A rotary motor includes a selectively rotatable rotor and a motion conversion mechanism configured to transform rotary motion of the rotor to linear motion of the stop mechanism in the first direction. A controller is configured to selectively rotate the rotor to cause linear translation of the stop mechanism toward or away from the cutting axis. A position detection system includes a visual sensor coupled to the stop mechanism and a ruler strip. The ruler strip includes a plurality of spaced apart position indicators configured for detection by the visual sensor in order to determine a position of the stop mechanism relative to the cutting axis of the cutting tool via position correlating perform by the controller.