Mitigation Action Set Aggregation for Cyber Threat Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing number of cybersecurity threats in computing environments leads to unwieldy management of mitigation actions, which can result in inefficiencies and potential harm if not addressed effectively.

Innovation Solution

Aggregating mitigation actions into optimized sets based on security controls, simulating different combinations, and performing these actions in batches to improve efficiency and reduce risk, while considering risk amplifiers and adverse effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If individual mitigation actions are addressed separately, then thoroughness of security coverage is improved, but management complexity and resource consumption increase exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual mitigation actions into aggregated mitigation action sets that can be managed and executed as unified groups. This aggregation reduces management complexity by consolidating numerous separate actions into fewer manageable sets while maintaining comprehensive security coverage through simulated validation of each set's effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If more mitigation actions are implemented, then risk reduction is improved, but computing resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk reductionVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements simulated validation of mitigation action sets to identify the optimal subset of actions that achieves adequate risk reduction without implementing every possible mitigation action. This allows the system to perform sufficient validation to ensure effectiveness while avoiding the excessive resource consumption that would result from implementing all potential mitigation actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If comprehensive mitigation actions are performed, then security effectiveness is improved, but time and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs simulated validation of mitigation action sets before actual implementation to pre-identify effective combinations of actions. This preliminary simulation phase allows the system to determine which mitigation action sets will be most effective, enabling faster and more efficient actual deployment without compromising security effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If mitigation actions are aggregated into sets, then operational efficiency is improved, but granularity of control is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol granularity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments mitigation actions into discrete, well-defined action sets that maintain internal granularity while enabling efficient aggregated management. Each mitigation action set contains specific, identifiable actions that can be individually understood and controlled, while the set structure enables efficient batch processing and validation through simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12549573B2Techniques for aggregating mitigation actions
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 ZAFRAN SECURITY LTD
  • US12549573B2 patent drawing
  • US12549573B2 patent drawing
  • US12549573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for mitigating cyber threats. A method includes aggregating a plurality of mitigation actions into at least one mitigation action set with respect to at least one security control, wherein each mitigation action set includes a respective subset of the plurality of mitigation actions corresponding to a respective security control of the at least one security control; and performing the at least one mitigation action set via the at least one security control, wherein performing each mitigation action set includes sending a respective set of instructions, wherein the set of instructions sent for each mitigation action set causes a respective security control of the at least one security control to implement each mitigation action of the mitigation action set.