Mitral Valve Stabilizer Arms for Leak Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for treating dysfunctional mitral valves are invasive, require skilled surgeons, and face challenges due to the mitral valve's irregular shape and lack of radial support, leading to issues with prosthetic fit and stability, and are associated with risks such as perivalvular leaks and potential collapse of the aortic tract.

Innovation Solution

An interventional device with subannular and supra-annular arms that can be advanced intravascularly to stabilize mitral valve leaflets and facilitate the placement of a prosthetic valve, featuring a deployable configuration that grips the leaflets and annulus, with locking mechanisms to secure the device and reduce the risk of leaks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional surgical approaches (open thoracotomy) are used for mitral valve replacement, then the procedure can be performed with established techniques, but the patient experiences significant pain and requires long recovery periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveestablished surgical techniquesVSAvoidpatient pain and recovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A delivery catheter is introduced as an intermediary device to deliver the prosthetic valve and stabilizing structures through the vasculature to the mitral valve position, avoiding the need for open thoracotomy and enabling percutaneous access

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The traditional mechanical surgical approach requiring large incisions and direct manual manipulation is replaced with a catheter-based delivery system that uses fluid dynamics and remote deployment mechanisms to achieve valve replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If a cylindrical prosthetic valve is implanted in the mitral position, then the valve can be easily manufactured and deployed, but gaps are left in the commissural regions causing perivalvular leaks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprosthetic valve fabricationVSAvoidsealing performance and prevention of perivalvular leaks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizing structures are configured with asymmetric geometries including curved arms and extensions that specifically target and conform to the irregular mitral annulus shape and commissural regions, rather than using symmetric cylindrical forms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the stabilizing structures have different functions: some arms provide general annular support while others with extensions specifically target commissural regions for enhanced sealing, creating localized quality variations to address specific anatomical challenges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If radial support is not provided to the mitral annulus during prosthetic valve implantation, then the procedure is simpler, but the aortic tract may collapse causing serious complications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplantation procedure simplicityVSAvoidaortic tract collapse
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Stabilizing structures are deployed in advance of the prosthetic valve to provide preliminary radial support to the mitral annulus and surrounding tissue, preventing aortic tract collapse before the valve is fully implanted

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The stabilizing structures act as a cushioning framework that is established beforehand to protect the aortic tract from collapse during the valve implantation process, absorbing mechanical stresses before they can cause damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Stability of the object's composition

If the mitral valve annulus is enlarged due to heart disease, then the heart muscle dilates as a compensatory mechanism, but the valve leaflets fail to coapt properly causing regurgitation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheart muscle compensationVSAvoidvalve closure function
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizing structures are designed to be deployable and adjustable, transitioning from a compressed delivery configuration to an expanded functional configuration that dynamically adapts to the enlarged annulus dimensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device changes its physical parameters including radius, arm span, and engagement force to match the enlarged annulus dimensions, providing appropriate support despite the altered anatomical parameters caused by heart disease

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12178702B2System for mitral valve repair and replacement
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 TWELVE INC
  • US12178702B2 patent drawing
  • US12178702B2 patent drawing
  • US12178702B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems for mitral valve repair are disclosed where one or more mitral valve interventional devices may be advanced intravascularly into the heart of a patient and deployed upon or along the mitral valve to stabilize the valve leaflets. The interventional device may also facilitate the placement or anchoring of a prosthetic mitral valve implant. The interventional device may generally comprise a distal set of arms pivotably and/or rotating coupled to a proximal set of arms which are also pivotably and/or rotating coupled. The distal set of arms may be advanced past the catheter opening to a subannular position (e.g., below the mitral valve) and reconfigured from a low-profile delivery configuration to a deployed securement configuration. The proximal arm members may then be deployed such that the distal and proximal arm members may grip the leaflets between the two sets of arms to stabilize the leaflets.