Mixed Criticality PPDU MCS Segmentation for Wi-Fi

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Wi-Fi protocols constrain the use of a single modulation and coding scheme (MCS) for the entire physical layer protocol data unit (PPDU), resulting in a trade-off between reliability and throughput, especially when handling mixed criticality messages.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method where an access point determines multiple MCSs for different sets of orthogonal frequency duplex multiplexing (OFDM) symbols and aggregates them into a single PHY service data unit (PSDU), allowing for enhanced robustness and throughput by using differentiated MCS levels within a single PPDU.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single MCS is used for the entire PPDU, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates when handling mixed criticality messages

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The PPDU is segmented into multiple parts, each with its own MCS. The patent introduces a differentiator field that identifies whether the PPDU contains a single MCS or multiple MCSs. When multiple MCSs are used, each data unit within the PPDU is associated with a specific MCS index, allowing different criticality levels to be handled with appropriate modulation and coding schemes while maintaining overall system structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the PPDU are assigned different MCS characteristics based on their criticality requirements. High criticality data units use more robust MCS (lower modulation order, higher coding rate) while low criticality data units use less robust but higher throughput MCS. This local differentiation allows each segment to be optimized for its specific requirements rather than using a uniform approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If a single MCS is used for the entire PPDU, then device complexity is reduced, but throughput deteriorates when handling mixed criticality messages

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The PPDU is segmented into multiple parts, each with its own MCS. The patent introduces a differentiator field that identifies whether the PPDU contains a single MCS or multiple MCSs. When multiple MCSs are used, each data unit within the PPDU is associated with a specific MCS index, allowing different criticality levels to be handled with appropriate modulation and coding schemes while maintaining overall system structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the MCS parameters (modulation order and coding rate) based on the criticality of different data units. By selecting from a set of predefined MCS indices, the system can dynamically adjust the robustness and throughput characteristics of each segment within the PPDU, optimizing overall productivity for mixed criticality traffic patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple MCSs are used within a single PPDU, then reliability is improved for mixed criticality messages, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverobustnessVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The PPDU is segmented into multiple parts, each with its own MCS. The patent introduces a differentiator field that identifies whether the PPDU contains a single MCS or multiple MCSs. When multiple MCSs are used, each data unit within the PPDU is associated with a specific MCS index, allowing different criticality levels to be handled with appropriate modulation and coding schemes while maintaining overall system structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the PPDU are assigned different MCS characteristics based on their criticality requirements. High criticality data units use more robust MCS (lower modulation order, higher coding rate) while low criticality data units use less robust but higher throughput MCS. This local differentiation allows each segment to be optimized for its specific requirements rather than using a uniform approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If multiple MCSs are used within a single PPDU, then throughput is improved for mixed criticality messages, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The PPDU is segmented into multiple parts, each with its own MCS. The patent introduces a differentiator field that identifies whether the PPDU contains a single MCS or multiple MCSs. When multiple MCSs are used, each data unit within the PPDU is associated with a specific MCS index, allowing different criticality levels to be handled with appropriate modulation and coding schemes while maintaining overall system structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the MCS parameters (modulation order and coding rate) based on the criticality of different data units. By selecting from a set of predefined MCS indices, the system can dynamically adjust the robustness and throughput characteristics of each segment within the PPDU, optimizing overall productivity for mixed criticality traffic patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250132870A1Modulation and coding scheme (MCS) for mixed criticality physical layer protocol data unit (PPDU)
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 MAXLINEAR INC
  • US20250132870A1 patent drawing
  • US20250132870A1 patent drawing
  • US20250132870A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An access point may include a processing device. The processing device may determine, at a medium access control (MAC) layer, a first modulation and coding scheme (MCS) for a first set of orthogonal frequency duplex multiplexing (OFDM) symbols. The processing device may determine, at the MAC layer, a second MCS for a second set of OFDM symbols. The processing device may generate, at the MAC layer, one or more aggregate MAC protocol data units (A-MPDUs) including the first MCS and the second MCS. The processing device may send, from the MAC layer to a physical layer (PHY), the one or more A-MPDUs to generate a PHY service data unit (PSDU) including the first MCS and the second MCS.