Mixed-Flow Exhaust Nozzle with Independent Throat and Exit Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mixed flow exhaust nozzles for turbofan engines lack the ability to independently control the nozzle throat and exit areas, limiting their effectiveness in varying thrust reversal and aerodynamic performance.

Innovation Solution

An articulating exhaust nozzle with independent control of nozzle throat and exit areas through actuators, allowing for varying nozzle geometries to optimize thrust reversal and aerodynamic efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing mixed flow exhaust nozzles are used, then the structure is simple, but the ability to independently control nozzle throat and exit areas is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent control of nozzle throat and exit areasVSAvoidnozzle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The exhaust nozzle is divided into multiple independent controllable sections: an inner skin with a first articulation axis and an outer skin with a second articulation axis. This segmentation allows independent control of the nozzle throat area (via inner skin rotation) and nozzle exit area (via outer skin rotation), resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity by organizing the complex control function into modular, independent segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The nozzle transitions from a static structure to a dynamic, adjustable geometry through the incorporation of articulation axes and actuators. The inner and outer skins can rotate independently about their respective articulation axes, enabling real-time adjustment of both throat and exit areas. This dynamic capability provides the adaptability needed for varying thrust reversal and aerodynamic performance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If fixed nozzle geometry is used, then the structure is simple, but thrust reversal and aerodynamic performance are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust reversal effectivenessVSAvoidnozzle geometry control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The nozzle geometry is made dynamically adjustable through the articulation system. The inner skin can rotate about the first articulation axis to optimize throat area for thrust reversal, while the outer skin rotates about the second articulation axis to optimize exit area for aerodynamic performance. This dynamic adaptability enables the nozzle to achieve optimal productivity across different flight conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The nozzle controls its performance by changing geometric parameters (throat area and exit area) independently. Through the articulation mechanism, the system can vary the angles of the inner and outer skins, thereby changing the effective area parameters to optimize thrust reversal effectiveness and aerodynamic efficiency for different operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If single articulation axis is used, then the structure is simple, but independent control of throat and exit areas is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent area controlVSAvoidarticulation mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The articulation mechanism is segmented into two independent systems: an inner skin articulation system with a first articulation axis and an outer skin articulation system with a second articulation axis. This segmentation enables independent control of throat and exit areas respectively, achieving the desired adaptability while organizing the complexity into separate, manageable subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from single-axis (one-dimensional) articulation to dual-axis (two-dimensional) articulation. By adding a second articulation axis for the outer skin, the system gains the freedom to control both throat and exit areas independently, effectively adding a dimension of control that enables the required adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP4184000B1Mixed flow exhaust thrust reverser with area control nozzle systems and methods
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 ROHR INC
  • EP4184000B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4184000B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4184000B1 patent drawingFigure 4A

AI summary

An articulating exhaust nozzle thrust reverser includes an outer articulating panel (210) comprising an outer skin (212) and an outer thrust reverser door (214) and an inner articulating panel (220) comprising a forward inner skin (222), an aft inner skin (224), and an inner thrust reverser door (226). The outer articulating panel (210) is configured to pivot to vary a nozzle exit area. The forward inner skin (222) is configured to pivot to vary a nozzle throat area. The outer thrust reverser door (214) is pivotally coupled to the outer skin (212). The inner thrust reverser door (226) is pivotally coupled to the aft inner skin (224). The outer articulating panel (210) and the inner articulating panel (220) may be individually operated to independently vary the exhaust nozzle throat area and/or the exhaust nozzle exit area.