Mixed Flow Turbine Hub Geometry to Suppress Flow Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing turbines suffer from flow separation on the surface of the turbine wheel, which reduces efficiency, and existing technologies do not effectively address this issue.

Innovation Solution

A mixed flow turbine design with specific blade configurations, including blades positioned on the outer side in the radial direction and a hub with a distance relationship Dh/Eave>0.4, along with a casing structure that includes a shroud wall, scroll outer peripheral wall, and dividing wall to manage flow paths, reducing adverse pressure gradients and promoting smooth flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional turbine blade configuration is used, then manufacturing is simpler, but flow separation occurs on the turbine wheel surface reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturbine efficiencyVSAvoidblade configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a hub with non-uniform geometry where the outer peripheral surface has a specific distance relationship (Dh/Eave>0.4) from the rotational axis. This local geometric modification at the hub region optimizes flow characteristics without changing the entire turbine structure, suppressing flow separation while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new geometric dimension by positioning blade leading edges such that tip ends are radially outward from hub ends, creating a three-dimensional blade configuration. This spatial arrangement in the radial direction optimizes flow attachment on the turbine wheel surface, improving efficiency without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If blade leading edges are positioned with tip ends radially outward from hub ends, then flow separation is suppressed, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturbine efficiencyVSAvoidblade position precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by defining a specific geometric ratio Dh/Eave>0.4 as the design criterion. This quantitative parameter provides a clear manufacturing target, allowing precision control through measurable geometric relationships rather than complex positional specifications, thus balancing efficiency improvement with manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If hub outer peripheral surface is positioned at specific distance from rotational axis, then adverse pressure gradient is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturbine efficiencyVSAvoidhub geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by modifying only the hub region geometry to achieve Dh/Eave>0.4, while keeping the rest of the turbine structure conventional. This localized geometric optimization reduces adverse pressure gradients and suppresses flow separation without requiring complex changes throughout the entire device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design suppresses flow separation and enhances turbine efficiency by minimizing adverse pressure gradients and promoting smooth flow, resulting in improved turbine performance.

Implementation Method 1

a turbine wheel (8) including a hub (12), and blades (14) provided on an outer peripheral surface (18) of the hub (12) at intervals in a circumferential direction of the hub (12)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbine: Turbine

Implementation Method 2

Since a separation of a flow on a surface of the turbine wheel is a factor that reduces turbine efficiency, it is important to suppress the separation on the surface of the turbine wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Data Source

PatentUS12460562B2Mixed flow turbine and turbocharger
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND ENGINE & TURBOCHARGER LTD
  • US12460562B2 patent drawing
  • US12460562B2 patent drawing
  • US12460562B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This mixed flow turbine is provided with a turbine wheel comprising a hub and blades provided at intervals in a circumferential direction of the hub on an outer peripheral surface of the hub. The tip ends of the leading edges of the blades are positioned on an outer side in the radial direction of the turbine wheel than the hub ends of the leading edges. When a distance between the downstream end of the outer peripheral surface of the hub and a rotational axis line of the turbine wheel is Dh and the average of distances between respective positions from the hub ends to the tip ends at the leading edges and the rotational axis line is Eave, Dh/Eave>0.4 is satisfied.