Mixed-Mode Driving Control for Manual-Autonomous Operation Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mixed mode automated driving systems face challenges in determining compatible manual and autonomous driving features, leading to inconsistencies and inefficiencies in vehicle operation.

Innovation Solution

A mixed mode driving controller that allows users to select and assign driving operations between human and computer control, using a recommendation module to determine optimal control based on user profiles, vehicle data, and environmental conditions, enabling fine-tuned control in various situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If automated driving operations are combined with manual driving operations in mixed mode, then the versatility and adaptability of the vehicle is improved, but the complexity of determining compatibility between control modes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixed mode driving capabilityVSAvoidcontrol compatibility determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments driving operations into distinct categories (steering, acceleration, braking) and evaluates compatibility at the segment level. The system divides the driving task into manageable components that can be independently assessed for manual-automated compatibility, reducing the overall complexity of the determination process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts control mode assignments based on real-time conditions, user preferences, and operational context. The compatibility determination is not static but adapts continuously to changing driving scenarios, allowing the vehicle to optimize the mix of manual and automated operations as conditions evolve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If the system provides detailed routing options with autonomous and manual control segments, then the information completeness is improved, but the complexity of processing and presenting route information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute control informationVSAvoidroute processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system divides the journey into segments with different control modes (fully autonomous, semi-autonomous, manual). Each segment is independently analyzed and presented, allowing the system to provide detailed control information without overwhelming the user with a monolithic route description.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides partial route information initially, focusing on key segments where control mode transitions occur. Detailed information about each segment is made available on-demand or when relevant, rather than presenting all possible information simultaneously, reducing processing complexity while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4011736B1Method and apparatus for mixed mode automated driving
Publication Date: 2024.12.11 HERE GLOBAL BV
  • EP4011736B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4011736B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4011736B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods for mix mode automated driving including accessing a profile associated with an automated driving trip, determining a list of driving operations for the automated driving trip, and determining at least one recommended driving operation included in the list of operations based on the profile, such that the at least one recommended driving operation includes a first driving operation designated to autonomous control and a second driving operation designated to manual control.