Mixed PID Controller for Drilling Rate Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Downhole drilling systems face instability and inefficiency due to lagging drilling fluid pressure measurements affecting the rate of penetration, leading to fluctuations in weight on bit and drilling fluid pressure, which existing PID controllers struggle to manage effectively.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a mixed PID controller that integrates drilling fluid pressure and weight on bit measurements, using proportional, integral, and derivative terms to adjust the drill pipe lowering rate, thereby stabilizing the drilling process and optimizing drilling fluid pressure and weight on bit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a traditional PID controller is used to control the drill pipe lowering rate, then the system is simpler to implement, but the responsiveness to changing drilling conditions deteriorates due to lagging drilling fluid pressure measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresponsivenessVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is segmented into multiple independent control loops: an outer PID controller that uses drilling fluid pressure measurements to determine target ROP, and an inner controller that directly controls the drill pipe lowering rate. This segmentation allows the outer loop to handle slow pressure variations while the inner loop provides fast responsiveness to ROP changes, resolving the contradiction between responsiveness and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The target rate of penetration (ROP) serves as an intermediary variable between the drilling fluid pressure measurements and the drill pipe lowering rate control. Instead of directly controlling lowering rate from pressure measurements (which causes lag), the system first converts pressure signals to target ROP values, then uses these targets to control the actual lowering rate, eliminating the lag effect and improving responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the drill pipe lowering rate is adjusted to maintain target ROP, then the rate of penetration improves, but fluctuations in weight on bit and drilling fluid pressure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate of penetrationVSAvoiddrilling parameter stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback control mechanism where actual ROP measurements are continuously compared with target ROP values. The PID controller adjusts the drill pipe lowering rate based on the error between actual and target ROP, ensuring that ROP remains stable at the desired setpoint while automatically compensating for disturbances, thus improving productivity without causing harmful fluctuations in other drilling parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller dynamically adjusts the drill pipe lowering rate in real-time based on changing drilling conditions and ROP measurements. Rather than using a fixed lowering rate, the system continuously modifies the lowering rate to maintain optimal ROP, allowing the system to adapt to varying formation conditions while maintaining stability in the overall drilling process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11566509B2Methods of drilling using mixed proportional integral derivative control
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US11566509B2 patent drawing
  • US11566509B2 patent drawing
  • US11566509B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A proportional integral derivative (PID) controller implements control over a drilling system based on an integral term and a proportional term. The integral term is the integral of an operating drilling fluid pressure compared to a target drilling fluid pressure. The proportional term is the difference between an operating weight on bit and a target weight on bit. The sum of the proportional term and the integral term is multiplied by a controller parameter to determine a surface rate of penetration. A drill pipe lowering rate may be changed based on the determined surface rate of penetration, and the process may repeat in an iterative cycle until the integral term is reduced to an acceptable degree.