Mixed-Autonomy Platoon Control Using Headway-Based Indirect Steering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing traffic control systems face inefficiencies when manually operated vehicles join a platoon of autonomous vehicles, disrupting the formation and stability of the platoon, as existing methods struggle to effectively control and model manually operated vehicles, leading to increased traffic congestion and reduced energy efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for controlling mixed vehicle platoons, using a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) controller to indirectly influence uncontrolled vehicles by setting constraints on headway and speed, allowing controlled vehicles to maintain a platoon formation with both autonomous and manually operated vehicles, utilizing a headway-based model to map target headways to target speeds and actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manually operated vehicles are allowed to join the platoon, then the platoon can accommodate mixed traffic types, but the platoon stability and control efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatoon composition flexibilityVSAvoidplatoon stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a behavior model as an intermediary layer between the control system and manually operated vehicles. This behavioral model predicts and captures the dynamics of manually operated vehicles, allowing the control system to indirectly influence them through controlled vehicles without requiring direct control of each manual vehicle, thus maintaining platoon stability while accommodating mixed traffic types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables manually operated vehicles to self-regulate their platoon participation through indirect control mechanisms. By using controlled vehicles to create environmental cues (such as spacing and speed patterns), the system allows manual drivers to self-adjust their behavior to match platoon dynamics, reducing the need for direct intervention while maintaining stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Stability of the object's composition

If all vehicles are equipped with CACC, then platoon control homogeneity is improved, but the complexity and cost of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol homogeneityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal control framework that works with both CACC-equipped vehicles and manually operated vehicles. The behavior model and indirect control mechanisms allow the system to achieve homogeneous platoon control without requiring every vehicle to have identical CACC equipment, thus reducing overall system complexity while maintaining control homogeneity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring all vehicles to have advanced CACC systems, the patent inverts the approach by equipping only controlled vehicles with CACC and using them to indirectly control manually operated vehicles. This reversal reduces the number of complex systems needed while achieving the same control homogeneity goals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Productivity

If manually operated vehicles are removed from the platoon, then platoon efficiency is improved, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring manual vehicle behavior prevents effective removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatoon efficiencyVSAvoidmanual vehicle behavior measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces direct mechanical control of manually operated vehicles with a behavioral modeling approach. Instead of attempting to directly measure and control each manual driver's actions, the system uses computational behavior models to predict and indirectly influence manual vehicle behavior, making the system more efficient while overcoming measurement difficulties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3891572B1Direct and indirect control of mixed- automata vehicle platoon
Publication Date: 2022.05.04 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • EP3891572B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3891572B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3891572B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A system for direct and indirect control of mixed-autonomy vehicles receives a traffic state of a group of mixed-autonomy vehicles traveling in the same direction, wherein the group of mixed-autonomy vehicles includes controlled vehicles willing to participate in a platoon formation and at least one uncontrolled vehicle, and wherein the traffic state is indicative of a state of each vehicle in the group, submit the traffic state into a parameterized function trained to transform the traffic state into target headways for the mixed-autonomy vehicles to produce the target headways, and submit the target headways to a headway-based model configured to map the target headways to target speeds of the mixed-autonomy vehicles to produce the target speeds. The system determines and transmits control commands to the controlled vehicle based on one or combination of the target headways and the target speeds.