Mixed Refrigerant Injection for Uniform LNG Heat Exchanger Evaporation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for liquefying natural gas face challenges due to nonuniform distribution of liquid and gas phases in cooling streams, leading to inefficient heat exchange and potential damage to compressor components from incomplete evaporation.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves introducing a cooling stream into a heat exchanger, expanding it into biphasic streams at different pressures, separating phases, and adjusting the flow rate based on temperature differences to ensure uniform evaporation and prevent incomplete evaporation, thereby maintaining efficient heat exchange and apparatus integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If a biphasic cooling stream is introduced into the heat exchanger, then the heat exchange efficiency is improved, but the uniform distribution of liquid and gas phases deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange efficiencyVSAvoiduniform distribution of phases
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling stream is divided into multiple separate streams, each introduced into different passages of the heat exchanger. This segmentation ensures that each passage receives a controlled mixture of liquid and gas phases, improving uniformity while maintaining heat exchange efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The liquid and gas phases are mixed before introduction into the heat exchanger passages. This preliminary mixing action ensures that the phases are uniformly distributed before entering the heat exchange process, resolving the distribution issue while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the flow rate of cooling stream is increased, then the liquefaction productivity is improved, but the risk of incomplete evaporation and compressor damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquefaction productivityVSAvoidcompressor safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The temperature of the cooling stream at the outlet of the heat exchanger is measured and used as feedback to control the flow rate of the cooling stream. When the temperature approaches the dew point (indicating incomplete evaporation), the flow rate is automatically reduced, preventing compressor damage while allowing high productivity during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Use of energy by moving object

If the cooling stream is expanded to multiple pressure levels, then the heat exchange performance is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange performanceVSAvoidexpansion system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple cooling streams at different pressure levels are merged into a single combined stream before introduction into the heat exchanger. This merging approach maintains the performance benefits of multi-level expansion while simplifying the overall device architecture by reducing the number of separate introduction points and control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures uniform distribution of phases, enhances energy performance, and prevents damage to compressor components by ensuring complete evaporation of the cooling stream, simplifying the architecture of the liquefaction plant and maintaining its integrity.

Implementation Method 1

the cooling stream is expanded, forming a liquid phase and a gaseous phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule-Thomson effect: Joule-Thomson Effect

Implementation Method 2

the cooling stream introduced into the exchanger in a biphasic state is evaporated therein against the hydrocarbon stream, which undergoes liquefaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

employing at least one cooling stream which evaporates in a heat exchanger against the hydrocarbon stream to be liquefied

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS12085334B2Method for liquefying natural gas with improved injection of a mixed refrigerant stream
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE
  • US12085334B2 patent drawing
  • US12085334B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for liquefying a stream of hydrocarbons from a feed stream, including introducing the feed stream and a first cooling stream into a first heat exchanger, extracting a plurality of partial cooling streams obtained from the first cooling stream from the heat exchanger via separate outlets, introducing each partial cooling stream into an expansion element to produce a plurality of biphasic cooling streams at different pressures, introducing each biphasic cooling stream into a phase separator element to produce a gaseous cooling stream which is diverted from the first exchanger and a liquid cooling stream which is introduced into the first exchanger via respective inlets, evaporating each liquid cooling stream by heat exchange with at least the feed stream and the first cooling stream so as to extract a cooled hydrocarbon stream at the outlet from the first heat exchanger and to extract a plurality of evaporated cooling streams.