Mixed-Service Grant Prioritization for URLLC MAC PDU Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication standards fail to provide a framework for handling overlapping grants in mixed-traffic scenarios involving multiple service types, leading to inefficiencies in spectral efficiency and Quality of Service (QoS) for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC) traffic.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for determining a prioritized grant among overlapping grants based on priority, reliability, and latency, allowing for the construction of a single MAC PDU or pre-emption of existing grants to ensure critical traffic QoS and system spectral efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple overlapping grants are allocated to different service types (URLLC and eMBB), then spectral efficiency is improved by utilizing all allocated resources, but QoS for URLLC traffic deteriorates due to inability to prioritize critical traffic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidQoS for URLLC traffic
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the grant handling process into distinct phases: identification of overlapping grants, determination of priority based on service type, and selective construction of MAC PDU. This segmentation allows the system to evaluate each grant independently and apply priority rules to ensure URLLC traffic receives appropriate treatment while still utilizing eMBB resources when no conflicts exist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by establishing a priority determination mechanism before grant execution. The UE identifies overlapping grants and determines their priorities based on service type (URLLC vs. eMBB) before constructing MAC PDUs. This preliminary prioritization ensures that when conflicts occur, URLLC traffic is automatically favored, maintaining QoS requirements while still allowing eMBB grants to be utilized when no overlaps exist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a framework for handling overlapping grants is implemented, then QoS for critical traffic is maintained, but device complexity increases due to additional processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQoS for critical trafficVSAvoidgrant handling processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing priority handling specifically at the point of grant overlap identification. Rather than complicating the entire grant processing pipeline, the solution introduces priority determination only where needed - when multiple grants overlap in time. This localized approach maintains simplicity for non-overlapping grants while providing sophisticated QoS management only when conflicts occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics by making the grant handling process adaptive based on overlap detection. The UE dynamically adjusts its behavior: when no overlaps are detected, standard grant processing applies; when overlaps are detected, the system activates priority determination and selective MAC PDU construction. This dynamic approach maintains simplicity for the common case while providing sophisticated handling only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If MAC PDU construction is performed for all overlapping grants, then all granted resources are utilized, but processing time increases and critical traffic latency requirements may not be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidMAC processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential function from MAC PDU construction by selectively building PDUs only for the highest priority grant among overlapping grants. Rather than constructing separate PDUs for all overlapping grants (which would waste processing time), the system identifies the single most important grant and constructs a MAC PDU only for that one. This extraction approach maintains resource utilization for the critical traffic while eliminating redundant processing for lower priority overlapping grants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12356413B2Multiple grant handling in mixed services scenarios
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12356413B2 patent drawing
  • US12356413B2 patent drawing
  • US12356413B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to certain embodiments, a method performed by a wireless device comprises receiving a first grant and a second grant from a network node. The first grant and the second grant are overlapping. The method comprises determining a prioritized one of the first grant and the second grant and constructing a Medium Access Control (MAC) Protocol Description Unit (PDU) for the prioritized grant of the first grant and the second grant. According to certain embodiments, a method performed by a network node comprises transmitting a first grant and a second grant to a wireless device. The first grant and the second grant are overlapping. The method comprises receiving a transmission from the wireless device on a prioritized one of the first grant and the second grant.