Mixed-Size Pillars for Probeable IC Interfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing cost of testing integrated circuits due to the miniaturization of micro-pillars, which makes probing and testing more expensive, and the difficulty in using test pads as both testing and operational interfaces due to their size and spacing.

Innovation Solution

The use of larger diameter 'macro'-pillars with similar heights to micro-pillars, allowing for cost-effective probing during testing and serving as an electrical interface during regular operation, while maintaining similar heights to micro-pillars for seamless integration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If micro-pillars are made smaller to increase density, then the number of interfaces increases, but the cost of probing and testing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of pillarsVSAvoidtesting cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The interface structure is segmented into two types of pillars: micro-pillars for high-density signal interfaces and macro-pillars for cost-effective testing and power interfaces. This segmentation allows the system to benefit from both high density and low testing cost by assigning different functions to different pillar types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Macro-pillars serve multiple functions: they provide cost-effective testing interfaces, power delivery, and ground connections. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated test structures, thereby reducing overall manufacturing complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If test pads are used for both testing and operational interfaces, then device complexity is reduced, but spacing and size constraints limit effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface structureVSAvoidpad spacing
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The interface is segmented into micro-pillars for signal connections and macro-pillars for power and testing. This segmentation allows each pillar type to be optimized independently: micro-pillars can be densely packed for signal integrity while macro-pillars can be larger and more spaced out for easy probing and power delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the interface are assigned different pillar sizes and functions based on local requirements: signal-critical regions use micro-pillars while power and test regions use macro-pillars. This local differentiation optimizes both density and testability without compromising overall device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9263409B2Mixed-sized pillars that are probeable and routable
Publication Date: 2016.02.16 ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9263409B2 patent drawing
  • US9263409B2 patent drawing
  • US9263409B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated circuit with probeable and routable interfaces is disclosed. The integrated circuit includes multiple micro-pillars that are attached to the surface of the integrated circuit, and multiple macro-pillars also attached to the surface of the integrated circuit. The micro-pillars provide an electrical interface to the integrated circuit during regular operation. The macro-pillars provide an electrical interface to the integrated circuit both during regular operation and during testing of the integrated circuit.