Mixed-Text Detection Using Synthetic Machine-Generated Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing difficulty in distinguishing between human-generated and machine-generated text, particularly in mixed texts edited by humans, poses challenges in assessing student work, identifying false information, and detecting copyright infringement.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the generation of a synthetic mixed text dataset by replacing portions of human-generated text with machine-generated text, using a large language model, and applying a text discriminator score to identify the proportion of machine-generated text through kernel density estimation and Metropolis-Hastings algorithm sampling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If LLM-generated text is edited by humans, then the text becomes more human-like and harder to detect, but the difficulty in detecting machine-generated text increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman-like quality of textVSAvoiddetection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by creating a synthetic mixed text dataset with known proportions of machine-generated text before evaluating the detector. This allows the system to calibrate and validate its detection capabilities against controlled conditions where the ground truth is known, enabling accurate detection even in texts that have been edited to appear more human-like.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary approach by using a synthetic mixed text dataset as a mediator between pure human-generated text and pure machine-generated text. This intermediate representation with known machine-generated proportions serves as a calibration standard, allowing the detection system to accurately measure and identify machine-generated content even when it has been subsequently edited by humans.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a detection system is developed to identify machine-generated text, then detection capability improves, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration by generating a synthetic mixed text dataset with known machine-generated text proportions before actual detection. This preliminary action establishes reference points and calibration curves that simplify the actual detection process, allowing the system to achieve high reliability without requiring overly complex real-time analysis during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a synthetic copy of the detection problem by generating artificial mixed text datasets that replicate the characteristics of real-world mixed text. This copying approach allows the system to develop and validate detection algorithms on controlled synthetic data, reducing the complexity of working with real-world variations while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If synthetic mixed text dataset is generated by replacing portions of human-generated text with machine-generated text, then detection accuracy improves, but the time required for dataset generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddataset generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs the time-consuming synthetic dataset generation as a preliminary action that is done once or infrequently, rather than continuously. By pre-generating and storing the synthetic mixed text datasets with various machine-generated text proportions, the system avoids the time cost of regenerating these datasets during each detection task, thereby maintaining high measurement precision without incurring continuous time penalties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses synthetic copying to create representative samples of mixed text with known machine-generated proportions. These synthetic copies serve as pre-computed reference data that can be quickly queried and evaluated during detection tasks, avoiding the need to perform time-consuming generation operations repeatedly while maintaining accurate measurement capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20260073132A1Systems and methods for detecting human-generated text and machine-generated text in mixed text
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US20260073132A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073132A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073132A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for detecting human-generated text and machine-generated text in mixed text are disclosed. A computer program receives a dataset of human-generated text and generates a synthetic mixed text dataset by randomly replacing portions of the human-generated text with machine-generated text. The program evaluates the synthetic mixed text dataset at multiple levels, each representing a different fraction of machine-generated text, and computes a first text discriminator score for each level. Upon receiving a text sample, the program computes a second text discriminator score, fits a kernel density estimate using a Gaussian kernel to model a conditional probability distribution, samples from a posterior distribution, and returns an interval representing the amount of machine-generated text in the sample. The program can also split the text sample into segments, define concatenated subsequences, identify indices that maximize an objective function, and return identified machine-generated segments to a user electronic device.