Mixed-Variable Optimization for Synthesizable Microelectronic Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods fail to effectively address the high dimensionality and mixed-variable complexity in materials innovation, treating machine learning and design optimization as separate processes, leading to inefficiencies in discovering new materials with complex physical mechanisms and synthesis feasibility challenges.

Innovation Solution

An ML-enhanced mixed-variable conceptual design optimization framework integrating natural language processing, physics-based ML, and a latent-variable Gaussian process model to iteratively explore and optimize candidate materials, incorporating synthesis feasibility and high-fidelity simulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high-fidelity simulations are used for design optimization, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to formidable cost and time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign optimization accuracyVSAvoidmaterials discovery rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The design space is segmented into multiple subspaces based on qualitative variables (material families, structures, synthesis methods), allowing parallel exploration of different regions without requiring exhaustive high-fidelity simulation of the entire space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Literature-based virtual screening and ML-assisted conceptual exploration are performed beforehand to identify promising candidate material families and reduce the search space before applying high-fidelity simulations, thus preparing the system in advance to avoid unnecessary costly computations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the design space is expanded to include mixed qualitative and quantitative variables, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity worsens due to disjointed design space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign variable coverageVSAvoiddesign space complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The design space is reorganized by introducing a hierarchical dimension where qualitative variables (material families, structures, synthesis methods) form the primary classification levels, and quantitative variables (compositions, properties, parameters) are nested within each qualitative category, transforming the disjointed mixed-variable space into a structured hierarchical framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Machine learning models serve as intermediaries that bridge qualitative and quantitative variables by learning relationships between material structures (qualitative) and their properties (quantitative), enabling the system to handle mixed-variable complexity without direct enumeration of the entire design space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If literature-based virtual screening is performed to extract material information, then productivity is improved, but loss of information worsens due to dispersity in literature-reported materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerials screening speedVSAvoidmaterial property accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where ML models are trained on extracted literature data, then used to identify gaps and inconsistencies, which trigger targeted literature re-examination or additional data collection, continuously improving the accuracy of material property extraction while maintaining high screening productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250322916A1Adaptive discovery and mixed-variable optimization of next generation synthesizable microelectronic materials
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 NORTHWESTERN UNIV
  • US20250322916A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322916A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322916A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention relates to systems and methods for adaptive discovery and mixed-variable optimization of synthesizable microelectronic materials, and applications of the same. Specifically, an exemplary system includes a virtual screening (VS) module to extract information from literatures of a knowledge base by text mining, a ML-assisted conceptual exploration (CE) module to identify candidate material families for the specific class of compound materials based on the extracted information via a combination of ML models and to generate exogenous models of objective functions f(x, y) and constraint functions g(x, y), and an adaptive discovery (AD) engine to generate and optimize design of the newly discovered compound materials. The AD engine includes a mixed-variable ML module, a mixed-integer optimization (MIO) module, and a high-fidelity evaluation (HFE) module, which are iteratively and sequentially executed.