Mixed-Waveform SSB Timing and Frequency Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in achieving sufficient timing and frequency resolution for high-frequency bands without increasing processing load at user equipment (UE), especially when using synchronization signal blocks (SSBs) with higher subcarrier spacings, which can reduce symbol duration and impact frequency division multiplexing capabilities.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a mixed-waveform approach for SSBs, using different waveform types for different portions (e.g., single carrier for PSS, OFDM for SSS, and SC-FDM for PBCH) to achieve desired timing and frequency resolutions while maintaining low processing load and supporting frequency division multiplexing, allowing for efficient communication over high-frequency bands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If higher subcarrier spacings are used for SSBs to achieve sufficient timing and frequency resolution for high-frequency bands, then timing and frequency resolution are improved, but symbol duration is reduced and processing load at UE increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming and frequency resolutionVSAvoidprocessing load at UE
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The SSB is divided into multiple portions, each using a different waveform type optimized for specific detection tasks. The first portion uses a first waveform type (e.g., single carrier) optimized for timing resolution, while the second portion uses a second waveform type (e.g., OFDM) optimized for frequency resolution and FDM capabilities. This segmentation allows each portion to be processed independently with appropriate algorithms, reducing overall processing complexity while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different waveform types are assigned to different portions of the SSB based on local requirements. The first portion is designed with properties optimal for timing detection (e.g., longer symbol duration, different cyclic prefix structure), while the second portion is designed with properties optimal for frequency detection and multiplexing (e.g., standard OFDM structure). This local optimization enables high resolution without uniformly increasing processing load across the entire SSB.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If higher subcarrier spacings are used for SSBs, then timing and frequency resolution are improved, but frequency division multiplexing capabilities are impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency resolutionVSAvoidfrequency division multiplexing capabilities
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The SSB is segmented into multiple portions with different waveform types. The second portion uses a waveform type (e.g., OFDM) that maintains compatibility with frequency division multiplexing schemes, allowing multiple signals to be multiplexed in the frequency domain. This segmentation preserves FDM capabilities while the first portion provides the necessary frequency resolution through its specific waveform characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mixed-waveform SSB structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: the first portion provides high timing and frequency resolution, while the second portion maintains compatibility with existing FDM frameworks and enables flexible multiplexing arrangements. This multi-functionality allows the system to achieve high measurement precision without sacrificing adaptability for various multiplexing scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If single waveform type is used for entire SSB, then processing complexity is reduced, but timing and frequency resolution for high-frequency bands are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidtiming and frequency resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different waveform types are assigned to different portions of the SSB based on local detection requirements. The first portion uses a waveform optimized for timing detection with appropriate symbol duration and structure, while the second portion uses a waveform optimized for frequency detection. This local quality differentiation enables high measurement precision without requiring the entire SSB to use a complex waveform, thus managing processing complexity effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12010049B2Mixed-waveform communications
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12010049B2 patent drawing
  • US12010049B2 patent drawing
  • US12010049B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A wireless device may monitor for a transmission of a synchronization signal block that includes a first portion generated using a first waveform type and a second portion using a second waveform type that is different than the first waveform type. The wireless device may detect the first portion of the synchronization signal block based on the first waveform type used for the first portion. After detecting the first portion of the synchronization signal block, the wireless device may process the second portion of the synchronization signal block based on information obtained from the first portion of the synchronization signal block. The information obtained from the first portion of the synchronization signal block may include timing information, frequency information, or both.