Mixer Impeller Blade Segmentation for Pumping Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mixer impellers are inefficient in maximizing pumping efficiency, leading to high energy and equipment costs, and their performance varies significantly with changes in the impeller diameter to tank diameter ratio.

Innovation Solution

The mixer impeller design features blades with a central hub, inclined leading edges, cambered structure, and tapered trailing edges, allowing for thinner material usage and reduced power draw while maintaining high efficiency and consistent performance across varying diameter ratios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If conventional mixer impeller designs are used, then the structure is simple, but the pumping efficiency is low and energy consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidblade structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is segmented into multiple portions (leading portion, trailing portion, tip portion) with distinct functional characteristics. The leading portion has a specific angle range (10-30 degrees) optimized for fluid entry, the trailing portion has a different angle range (5-20 degrees) for fluid discharge, and the tip portion is rounded to reduce turbulence. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized independently for its specific function, improving overall pumping efficiency while managing structural complexity through functional specialization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the blade are given different geometric properties tailored to their specific functions. The leading edge has a sharper angle for effective fluid engagement, the trailing edge has a more gradual angle for smooth flow discharge, and the tip is rounded to minimize turbulence. The blade thickness and curvature vary along the length to optimize structural strength where needed and flow efficiency where required. This local differentiation maximizes pumping performance while maintaining reasonable structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If blade length is increased to improve mixing effect, then mixing performance improves, but equipment costs and energy requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing performanceVSAvoidpower requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The blade geometry parameters are optimized to achieve maximum pumping efficiency at reduced blade lengths. The leading portion angle is set to 10-30 degrees, the trailing portion angle to 5-20 degrees, and the camber line curvature is carefully controlled. These parameter optimizations allow the blade to generate sufficient thrust and mixing action with shorter lengths, reducing both the power required to drive the impeller and the overall equipment size while maintaining effective mixing performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If impeller diameter is increased to improve mixing efficiency, then mixing performance improves, but the performance becomes sensitive to changes in impeller diameter to tank diameter ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidperformance consistency across different diameter ratios
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The blade geometry is designed with universal characteristics that provide consistent performance across a range of impeller-to-tank diameter ratios. The leading portion angle (10-30 degrees), trailing portion angle (5-20 degrees), and camber line curvature are optimized to maintain effective fluid handling whether the impeller is small relative to the tank or larger. This universal design allows the same blade configuration to deliver reliable mixing performance in different tank sizes and applications, reducing the need for custom blade designs for each specific diameter ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves higher efficiency and reduced energy consumption, enabling the use of smaller equipment and maintaining performance consistency across different impeller and tank diameter ratios, thus lowering costs and energy requirements.

Implementation Method 1

the blades may be oriented such that the leading edges thereof are inclined upwardly from trailing edges thereof... Each of the blades has a root attached to the hub, a tip, and a first crease that may extend along substantially an entire length of the blade dividing the blade into a leading portion and a trailing portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Implementation Method 2

radial and rotational fluid flow resulting from operation of the impeller should be minimized. By increasing the efficiency of a mixer impeller, the horsepower required to achieve a given mixing rate may be reduced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Data Source

PatentUS8220986B2High efficiency mixer-impeller
Publication Date: 2012.07.17 NOV NORTH AMERICA IP LLC
  • US8220986B2 patent drawing
  • US8220986B2 patent drawing
  • US8220986B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mixer impeller having high efficiency blades. The impeller may include a central hub and a plurality of blades attached to and extending radially outwardly from the hub such that leading edges thereof are inclined upwardly from trailing edges thereof. Each of the blades may include a root attached to the hub, a tip, a first crease extending along substantially an entire length of the blade dividing the blade into a leading portion and a trailing portion, the leading and trailing portions meeting at the first crease such that the leading portion is angled downwardly from the trailing portion, and a second crease extending from a portion of the leading edge of the leading portion between the root and the tip diagonally along the leading portion to the tip, the second crease intersecting the tip at a point spaced from a point where the first crease intersects the tip, the second crease forming a tip portion of the leading portion that needs a remainder of the leading portion such that the tip portion is angled downwardly from the leading portion.