Mixing Container Agitator With Lifting Arm for Gentle Meat Cooking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food processors are not well-suited for preparing pieces of meat, as they lack a mechanism to lift and turn food without causing damage, especially when cooking on a heated surface.

Innovation Solution

The food processor is equipped with an agitator featuring a lifting arm with a stub section that prevents cutting and a scoop section for lifting food, allowing it to be raised and turned without damage, using a non-rotatably connected vertical section with a blade edge and a control system to manage heating and stirring times to prevent over-processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a conventional agitator with pointed edges is used, then stirring efficiency is improved, but meat pieces are cut up and damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestirring efficiencyVSAvoidmechanical damage to meat
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The agitator blade is designed with different local properties: a blunt front edge (2 cm radius) that prevents cutting, and a lifting section with increased vertical distance that enables effective lifting and turning of meat pieces. This local differentiation allows the same component to perform both gentle handling and effective stirring functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If continuous stirring is applied to ensure even cooking, then cooking uniformity is improved, but meat pieces are over-processed and damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking uniformityVSAvoidover-processing damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit implements periodic stirring cycles with variable intervals, switching between different stirring frequencies based on cooking stage and meat piece size. This periodic action ensures even heat distribution while avoiding continuous mechanical stress that would damage the meat.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If high heating power is applied to reduce cooking time, then productivity is improved, but risk of burning and overheating increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking speedVSAvoidburning and overheating
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors cooking progress and dynamically adjusts heating power based on detected temperature and cooking stage. This feedback mechanism allows high heating power to be applied when appropriate while automatically reducing power to prevent burning, enabling fast yet safe cooking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If multiple agitator arms are added to improve stirring coverage, then mixing effectiveness is improved, but device complexity and mechanical stress increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestirring coverageVSAvoidagitator structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The agitator is segmented into functionally distinct sections: a blunt front edge for gentle engagement, a lifting section for raising meat pieces, and a blade section for stirring. This segmentation allows a single arm to perform multiple functions that would otherwise require multiple arms, reducing complexity while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables efficient and gentle handling of meat pieces during cooking, maintaining their integrity by minimizing mechanical stress and optimizing temperature control, ensuring even cooking and preventing over-heating or over-stirring.

Implementation Method 1

a heating unit (11) for heating the mixing vessel base (10)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

an agitator (5) which can be operated via an electric drive (6)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP2460452B1Kitchen appliance with a mixing container
Publication Date: 2014.08.20 VORWERK & CO INTERHOLDING GMBH
  • EP2460452B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2460452B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2460452B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The appliance (1) has a drive (6) for driving a stirring unit (5) in a stirred vessel (4), where a lower region of the vessel is heatable. An adjustment unit automatically adjusts stirring phases by stirring interrupting phases with respect to speed, where reduced speed is determined according to measuring data corresponding to the vessel, cooked food in the vessel or a drive of the stirring unit. The adjustment unit automatically adjusts heating phases by heating interrupting phases with respect to heat output. The stirring unit is provided with a lifting arm (15). An independent claim is also included for a method for operating a kitchen appliance.