Mixing Kneader for Continuous Polymerization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current polymerization processes in stirred tank reactors face issues with high apparent viscosity leading to inhomogeneous distribution, lump formation, and inefficient solvent use, while continuous extruders struggle with maintaining plug flow and limited throughput due to high viscosities and exothermic reactions.

Innovation Solution

A process using a mixing kneader with a small solvent excess and high viscosity capabilities, allowing for 80-95% conversion rates and large throughputs, where monomers, catalysts, and initiators are continuously added and reacted in a backmixed environment with self-cleaning mixing elements, and evaporative cooling effectively manages heat and energy dissipation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If stirred tank reactors are used for polymerization, then homogeneous distribution of monomers can be achieved, but the apparent viscosity rises with polymer concentration making the stirrer ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehomogeneous distributionVSAvoidapparent viscosity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state parameter of the reaction mixture by operating in the viscous phase with high polymer concentration (up to 100% bulk polymerization), transforming the system from liquid-dominated to viscous paste-dominated rheology, which allows effective mixing despite high viscosity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical stirring with a self-cleaning extruder system that uses screw conveyor mechanics and shear forces to achieve homogeneous mixing and distribution of monomers in the viscous phase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If stirred tank reactors operate with high solvent content to maintain low viscosity, then mixing is effective, but additional process steps for solvent removal are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing effectivenessVSAvoidprocess steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the solvent removal step by operating in bulk polymerization mode with minimal or no solvent, directly producing polymer that can be discharged without additional dewatering, condensation, or drying systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the solvent concentration parameter from high (90% in conventional processes) to very low or zero (bulk polymerization), fundamentally altering the process to eliminate the need for solvent recovery equipment and steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If continuous extruders with large L/D ratio are used for bulk polymerization, then high conversion is achieved, but plug flow cannot be maintained in slow reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion rateVSAvoidplug flow uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the L/D ratio parameter from large (>5 to 40) to small (0.5 to 2.5), fundamentally altering the flow regime from plug flow to backmixed flow, which maintains uniform composition throughout the reaction volume even for slow reactions with residence times >5 minutes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Temperature

If evaporative cooling is used in extruders with large L/D ratio, then heat removal is effective, but polymer entrainment in vapor lines occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat removalVSAvoidpolymer entrainment
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the evaporative cooling system by providing sufficient free cross-sectional area for vapor removal in the shortened extruder configuration, preventing polymer entrainment while maintaining effective heat and energy dissipation removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Temperature

If monomers are evaporated for cooling in extruders, then heat is removed, but monomer concentration shifts in the reactor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectVSAvoidmonomer concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback system where evaporated monomer or solvent is condensed in an external condenser and the condensate is recycled back into the reactor, maintaining constant monomer concentration and formulation throughout the process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

6Volume of stationary object

If small free product volume is used in screws, then equipment size is reduced, but throughput is limited for long residence times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment sizeVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the L/D ratio parameter to a small value (0.5 to 2.5) and increases the number of mixing and kneading elements, achieving high throughput (up to 10 t/h) in a compact device volume while maintaining residence times >5 minutes through efficient backmixed flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables uniform product quality, prevents foam formation, and eliminates the need for mechanical/thermal solvent removal, achieving high conversion rates and large throughputs with minimal solvent use, while maintaining product uniformity and efficient energy management.

Implementation Method 1

The high exothermicity of many polymerization processes and the dissipated kneading energy frequently make it necessary to remove these energies by means of evaporative cooling. This is done by evaporating a portion of the monomer or of an added solvent/diluent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

This is done by evaporating a portion of the monomer or of an added solvent/diluent, condensing it in an external condenser and recycling the condensate into the reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS8376607B2Method for the continuous implementation of polymerisation processes
Publication Date: 2013.02.19 BIOQUEST PROSTHETICS LLC
  • US8376607B2 patent drawing
  • US8376607B2 patent drawing
  • US8376607B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for continuously performing polymerization processes, wherein monomer(s), catalysts, and initiators are added continuously to a backmixed mixing kneader (1-1.3) with a length/diameter ratio of 0.5-3.5 and backmixed therein with already reacted product, and the reacted product is simultaneously drawn off continuously from the mixing kneader (1-1.3).