Mixing Tower Hopper Anti-Clogging Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing loading systems for cement and asphalt conglomerates often experience uncontrolled material loading, leading to partial or total blocking of the conveyor hopper, resulting in interrupted operations and increased costs due to the complexity of clearing blockages.

Innovation Solution

A mixing tower with a lifting and unloading system featuring a supporting structure, a containing element, and a drawing element that moves along a predetermined pathway, coupled with a motor and transmission system to prevent overloading and clogging, utilizing a counterweight and anti-clogging device regulated by sensors to manage material flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If material is loaded into the hopper without controlled flow regulation, then loading speed increases, but hopper blocking occurs causing operational interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading speedVSAvoidcontinuous operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic flow regulation system where the mixer outlet is equipped with a closing element that can be actively positioned to control material flow. The system transitions from static, uncontrolled loading to dynamic regulation based on real-time hopper fill level detection, allowing the loading speed to adapt to current operational conditions and prevent blocking while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a feedback mechanism through sensors (such as load cells or level sensors) that continuously monitor the hopper's fill level or material flow conditions. This feedback is processed by a control unit that automatically adjusts the closing element position to regulate material flow, creating a closed-loop control system that prevents hopper blocking while optimizing loading speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If manual intervention is used to clear hopper blockages, then hopper can be freed, but operational downtime increases and labor costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehopper clearingVSAvoidoperational downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service system where the automated flow regulation mechanism prevents hopper blockages before they occur. By continuously monitoring hopper fill levels and automatically adjusting the mixer outlet closing element, the system eliminates the need for manual intervention to clear blockages, making the system self-regulating and preventing the condition that would require manual clearing in the first place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by detecting hopper fill levels in advance using sensors and proactively regulating material flow before blockage occurs. The control system anticipates potential blocking conditions and adjusts the closing element position preemptively, preventing the formation of blockages that would otherwise require manual clearing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If automated flow regulation is implemented, then hopper blocking is prevented, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehopper flow controlVSAvoidloading system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple functions into the existing mixer and hopper structure. The closing element on the mixer outlet serves both as a flow control mechanism and as part of the normal mixing and discharge operation. The control unit and sensors are incorporated into the existing structural framework, allowing the automated regulation system to perform multiple roles without requiring entirely separate components, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a closing element as an intermediary component between the mixer and hopper that mediates material flow. This intermediate component provides precise flow control without requiring complex mechanisms in either the mixer or hopper themselves. The closing element acts as a simple yet effective mediator that regulates material passage based on control signals, simplifying the overall control architecture while achieving reliable flow regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures reliable and efficient loading, minimizing downtime and labor costs by preventing hopper overloading and automatically regulating material flow to maintain optimal operation.

Implementation Method 1

a counterweight and anti-clogging device regulated by sensors to manage material flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCounterweight: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2441728B1Mixing tower and process for the production of conglomerates, particularly for the production of concrete or bituminous conglomerates
Publication Date: 2015.06.03 MAURO SERVICE IMPIANTI
  • EP2441728B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2441728B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2441728B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A mixing tower (100) is described, for production of cement conglomerates or asphalt conglomerates, having a loading system comprising a supporting structure (2), a mixer (201) borne by the supporting structure (2), a hopper (103) underlying the mixer (201). The tower bears a containing element for lifting the aggregate material which is moved by two parallel chains.