Decentralized Mixnet Authentication via Incentivized Token Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional authentication systems are centralized, prone to single points of failure, network surveillance, and censorship, and do not provide strong privacy guarantees, making them vulnerable to identity theft and unable to support temporary or multiple identities, while also being computationally expensive and having low deployment rates.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized incentivized mixnet using NYM tokens for authentication, which are publicly verifiable and incentivize honest behavior in the network, allowing users to authenticate without revealing personal information and enabling pseudonymous identities, while preventing denial-of-service attacks and scaling the network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If centralized authentication systems are used, then authentication functionality is provided, but user privacy is compromised and single points of failure exist

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidprivacy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system is segmented into multiple independent components: identity providers issue credentials, mix nodes route traffic, and service providers verify authentication. This segmentation eliminates the single point of failure in centralized systems while maintaining authentication reliability through distributed verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Mix nodes serve as intermediaries between users and service providers, routing traffic through multiple hops to conceal user identity. This intermediary layer protects user privacy by preventing direct observation of communication patterns while still enabling successful authentication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If decentralized authentication is implemented, then privacy is protected, but network surveillance and censorship resistance become challenges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidcensorship resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts to censorship attempts through cryptographic techniques. Zero-knowledge proofs dynamically verify user credentials without revealing identity information, and the mixnet dynamically routes traffic through different paths to prevent pattern recognition and censorship.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication parameters are changed from centralized verification to decentralized zero-knowledge proof verification. This parameter change enables privacy protection by proving authentication without revealing underlying identity data, while maintaining censorship resistance through cryptographic guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If traditional authentication methods are used, then user identity is verified, but computational expense increases and deployment rates decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentity verificationVSAvoiddeployment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

User credentials are preliminarily verified and issued by identity providers before interaction with service providers. This preliminary action shifts computational expense to credential issuance rather than repeated verification, reducing ongoing computational burden and enabling faster deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses cryptographic copies of identity information in the form of credentials and tokens. Instead of repeatedly processing sensitive identity data, the system verifies cryptographic copies, dramatically reducing computational expense while maintaining verification reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Object-affected harmful factors

If anonymous communication channels are provided, then user privacy is enhanced, but network traffic patterns remain visible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy enhancementVSAvoidtraffic pattern visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple user traffic streams are merged together in the mixnet, where packets from different users are combined and re-routed through multiple nodes. This merging makes it computationally infeasible to distinguish individual traffic patterns while preserving the anonymity of each user's communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20230066860A1Decentralized incentivized mixnet
Publication Date: 2023.03.02 NYM TECH SA
  • US20230066860A1 patent drawing
  • US20230066860A1 patent drawing
  • US20230066860A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A decentralized incentivized mixnet includes a blockchain token awarded to mixnet nodes that provision private computer network communication services via mixing packets and providing digital signatures. The blockchain token award are based on a combination of rewards and fees paid by users of the incentivized mixnet according to the reliability of packet mixing provided by the individual mix nodes in the network. The value of the blockchain token allows the mixnet to balance demand for privacy of mixing packets by users with the supply of computers run by the mixing nodes. Users may spend the mixnet access tokens by sending attribute certificates with evidence of identity to an identify provider for verification, triggering an issuance of a credential, transferring access tokens from the user’s wallet to a service provider via confirmation on a blockchain, revealing the credentials to a service provider.