Machine Learning Ablation Guidance for Persistent AFib

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack a reliable way to predict the optimal location for ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AFIB), as existing features do not collectively provide a consistent solution for guiding physicians during the ablation process.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that receives data from various devices, processes it to determine an optimal ablation location, and provides necessary parameters for performing the ablation, utilizing algorithms such as naive Bayes, decision trees, and neural networks to predict the best location and parameters for successful ablation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple features are used to guide ablation location, then the comprehensiveness of guidance is improved, but the reliability of prediction remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of guidanceVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple machine learning models (naive Bayes, decision trees, neural networks) into an integrated system that processes multiple features simultaneously. This merging of models and features creates a comprehensive guidance system that overcomes the limitation of individual features while maintaining prediction reliability through ensemble methodology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a composite approach by integrating multiple types of machine learning algorithms (probabilistic naive Bayes, rule-based decision trees, and pattern-recognition neural networks) to create a hybrid predictive system. This composite model structure leverages the strengths of each algorithm type to achieve both comprehensive feature analysis and reliable predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Measurement precision

If machine learning algorithms are used to predict optimal ablation location, then the precision of location identification is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation identification precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex prediction task into three distinct machine learning components, each handling specific aspects of feature analysis. The naive Bayes model handles probabilistic feature evaluation, decision trees manage rule-based classifications, and neural networks capture complex patterns. This segmentation reduces overall system complexity while maintaining high prediction precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces machine learning models as intermediary layers between raw cardiac data and ablation location recommendations. These intermediaries process and transform complex input features into simplified predictions, reducing the complexity burden on the clinical workflow while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20220008126A1Optimized ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation
Publication Date: 2022.01.13 BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD
  • US20220008126A1 patent drawing
  • US20220008126A1 patent drawing
  • US20220008126A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus of aiding a physician in locating an area to perform an ablation on patients with atrial fibrillation (AFIB) includes receiving data at a machine, from at least one device, the data including information relating to a desired location for performing an ablation, generating, by the machine, an optimal location for performing the ablation based upon the data and inputs, and providing an optimal set of ablation parameters for performing the ablation at the location output by the model, or at a location specified by the physician.