Machine Learning Additive Manufacturing Parameter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional additive manufacturing processes require lengthy development cycles and high costs due to the difficulty in adjusting and understanding the impact of multiple parameters on part quality, lacking a systematic method for integrating feedback to improve the process.

Innovation Solution

The use of machine learning to build predictive models that optimize additive process parameters, such as relating machine parameters to defect concentration, material behavior, and build efficiency, through an intelligent sampling protocol and iterative design of experiments, reducing the need for manual evaluation and speeding up the development process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional manual methods are used to adjust and evaluate additive manufacturing parameters, then comprehensive control over multiple parameters is achieved, but development cycles become lengthy and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart qualityVSAvoiddevelopment cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops where process parameters are adjusted based on real-time sensor data and machine learning model predictions. The machine learning model continuously learns from experimental results and provides feedback to optimize parameters, eliminating lengthy manual trial-and-error cycles while maintaining part quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual evaluation and adjustment processes are replaced with automated machine learning systems. The machine learning model substitutes human experts in analyzing complex parameter interactions and making optimization decisions, dramatically reducing development time while maintaining or improving part quality through more precise and consistent parameter control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive parameter control is implemented manually, then part quality is maintained, but the complexity of managing multiple parameters increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart qualityVSAvoidparameter management
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it analyzes sensor data, predicts optimal parameters, evaluates experimental results, and guides subsequent experiments. This multi-functional automated system replaces multiple separate manual processes, reducing the perceived complexity while maintaining comprehensive parameter control for consistent part quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model acts as an intermediary between raw sensor data and parameter optimization decisions. It processes complex multidimensional parameter interactions and translates them into actionable optimization guidance, simplifying the management complexity for operators while ensuring comprehensive control over all parameters affecting part quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If machine learning models are used to optimize parameters, then development time is reduced, but the initial setup and data collection requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment speedVSAvoidsystem setup
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection and model training during initial setup phases. By collecting training data and establishing the machine learning model before production optimization begins, the system enables rapid parameter optimization thereafter. This preliminary action reduces long-term development time despite the initial setup investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning system becomes self-improving through continuous learning from experimental results. Once initially trained, it automatically optimizes parameters without requiring increasing levels of manual intervention or system complexity. The system serves itself by continuously refining its models based on new data, maintaining high productivity while managing setup complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11511491B2Machine learning assisted development in additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11511491B2 patent drawing
  • US11511491B2 patent drawing
  • US11511491B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for optimizing additive process parameters for an additive manufacturing process. In some embodiments, the process includes receiving initial additive process parameters, generating an uninformed design of experiment utilizing a specified sampling protocol, next generating, based on the uninformed design of experiment, response data, and then generating, based on the response data and on previous design of experiment that includes at least one of the uninformed design of experiment and informed design of experiment, an informed design of experiment by using the machine learning model and the intelligent sampling protocol. The last process step is repeated until a specified objective is reached or satisfied.