ML Algorithm Selection for Pharmacy Prescription Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual entry of prescription data from handwritten facsimile prescriptions into pharmacy systems is time-consuming and inefficient, requiring significant human intervention and leading to delays in the prescription filling process.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that uses machine learning algorithms to predict and auto-populate required pharmacy element values in prescriptions, thereby reducing the need for manual data entry and enhancing processing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual data entry is used for prescription processing, then human verification ensures accuracy, but processing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprescription data accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically extracting data from faxed prescriptions using OCR and populating pharmacy system fields before pharmacist review. This pre-filling of data reduces the time pharmacists need to spend on manual verification while maintaining accuracy through automated data capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary automated system acts as a bridge between faxed prescriptions and the pharmacy management system. This intermediary uses optical character recognition and data extraction technologies to convert handwritten fax data into structured digital format, eliminating the need for manual typing while enabling automated verification workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If manual data entry is performed by pharmacy technicians, then data can be entered into the system, but labor costs and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata entry capabilityVSAvoidprescription processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically capturing prescription data from incoming faxes and populating the pharmacy management system without human intervention. The automated extraction and data population processes eliminate the need for pharmacy technician involvement in data entry, freeing them to focus on higher-value tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical data entry by pharmacy technicians is replaced with an automated electronic system using optical character recognition and data extraction algorithms. This substitution transforms the manual labor-intensive process into an automated electronic workflow, significantly increasing processing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If pharmacists manually verify prescription data, then patient safety is ensured, but the verification process becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprescription verification accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification actions by pre-populating all required prescription fields with extracted data before pharmacist review. This allows pharmacists to verify complete prescription information rather than manually entering and then verifying data, significantly reducing verification time while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to pharmacists by highlighting extracted data fields for verification and flagging any anomalies or inconsistencies in the automatically captured information. This structured feedback mechanism streamlines the verification process, allowing pharmacists to focus their attention on critical safety checks rather than reviewing all data from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12340886B2Methods and systems for selecting a machine learning algorithm
Publication Date: 2025.06.24 EXPRESS SCRIPTS STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT INC
  • US12340886B2 patent drawing
  • US12340886B2 patent drawing
  • US12340886B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for selecting a machine learning algorithm are described. In one embodiment, one or more factors to be used by a machine learning algorithm in predicting a value of a required pharmacy element of a prescription are identified, the machine learning algorithm is trained to predict the value of the required pharmacy element using a first subset of previously received prescriptions, a success rates for the machine learning algorithm at predicting respective known values of respective known required pharmacy elements for each of a second subset of the previously received prescriptions are determined, and the machine learning algorithm predicts the value of the required pharmacy element of the prescription for a first predetermined period.