ML-Assisted Separation Membrane Screening for Fit-for-Purpose Selectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional membrane fabrication for water treatment relies heavily on empirical approaches, leading to high development costs and time, with limited advances in polymer-based membrane materials, and there is a need for a more efficient and targeted design strategy for separation membranes with 'fit-for-purpose' selectivity.

Innovation Solution

An ML-assisted framework integrating polymer screening, interpretable ML models, mechanistic constitutive models, and statistical ML models to predict and guide the design of next-generation separation membranes with desired properties, optimizing fabrication conditions and materials in a time- and cost-effective manner.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional empirical approaches are used for membrane fabrication, then membrane separation performance can be achieved, but development costs and time are excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemembrane separation performanceVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using machine learning models to predict membrane performance before actual fabrication and experimentation. The ML models are trained on existing data to screen and rank candidate membrane formulations, allowing researchers to identify promising candidates in advance and avoid exhaustive experimental testing of all possible combinations, thereby significantly reducing development time while maintaining performance reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs copying by creating virtual replicas of membrane systems through machine learning models. These digital twins simulate membrane behavior and performance under various conditions, enabling virtual experimentation and optimization without physical prototyping. This approach allows multiple iterations of design exploration at low cost before committing to actual membrane fabrication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If exhaustive experimental investigations are conducted to screen membrane materials, then optimal membrane properties can be identified, but development costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemembrane property optimizationVSAvoiddevelopment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using machine learning to identify and focus experimental efforts only on the most promising membrane candidates from a screened list. Instead of exhaustively testing all possible material combinations, the ML model ranks candidates and guides experimentation on a selective subset, achieving optimal membrane property identification with significantly reduced material consumption and development costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by employing machine learning models that can rapidly evaluate the effect of varying membrane formulation parameters (such as polymer composition, crosslinking density, pore size) on performance. The models predict outcomes for different parameter combinations, allowing optimization of membrane properties through computational parameter tuning before physical fabrication, thereby reducing the need for expensive iterative experimentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If trial-and-error fabrication processes are used to explore new membrane materials, then new membrane materials can be discovered, but the process is inefficient and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenew membrane material discoveryVSAvoidmembrane development efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using machine learning models that learn from experimental data and continuously improve their predictions. The models are trained on results from previous experiments and use this feedback to refine their understanding of structure-performance relationships. This iterative feedback loop enables the system to become increasingly accurate at predicting new membrane material performance, accelerating discovery while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies mechanics substitution by replacing the traditional mechanical trial-and-error fabrication process with computational machine learning systems. Instead of physically synthesizing and testing numerous membrane variants through manual experimentation, the ML models perform virtual screening and prediction, substituting computational algorithms for physical trial-and-error processes, thereby dramatically improving development efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250265391A1Machine learning-assisted rational design of separation membranes
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 GEORGIA TECH RES CORP
  • US20250265391A1 patent drawing
  • US20250265391A1 patent drawing
  • US20250265391A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An ML-assisted framework is disclosed that can guide the design of fit-for-purpose separation membranes for resource recovery and clean water production from wastewaters. Approaches and methodologies for executing the work include the integrated components: 1) ML-assisted new polymer screening; 2) development of an interpretable ML model for membrane properties prediction; 3) mechanistic constitutive model; 4) development of a statistical ML model with a combination of proper regularization for membrane performance prediction; 5) separation membrane fabrication and evaluation.