ML-Based AF Treatment Selection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for atrial fibrillation, such as pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), face challenges in predicting long-term success, especially with incomplete imaging data, which hinders the selection of appropriate ablation approaches and leads to suboptimal treatment outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using machine learning (ML) models that analyze anatomical and voltage-related features of the heart to predict the success of PVI treatments, incorporating a 'wisdom of the crowd' approach to overcome data scarcity by leveraging physician recommendations, thereby selecting between PVI only and PVI plus procedures based on patient-specific data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) only treatment is used, then treatment simplicity is improved, but long-term treatment success rate deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment simplicityVSAvoidlong-term treatment success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of treatment selection by using machine learning models to analyze multiple heart features (anatomical, voltage, rhythm) and determine whether a patient requires PVI only or PVI plus treatment, optimizing the treatment approach based on individual patient characteristics rather than applying a uniform simple approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of heart features and ML model predictions before treatment to identify patients who are likely to fail PVI only treatment, allowing clinicians to plan more comprehensive PVI plus treatments in advance for those high-risk patients

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If more comprehensive treatment (PVI plus) is used, then long-term treatment success rate is improved, but treatment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelong-term treatment success rateVSAvoidtreatment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring the treatment approach to individual patient characteristics - using PVI only for patients with favorable features and PVI plus for patients with unfavorable features, rather than applying comprehensive treatment to all patients

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses machine learning models to analyze changes in heart parameters (anatomical structure, voltage patterns, rhythm characteristics) to predict treatment outcomes and guide the selection between PVI only and PVI plus treatments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If traditional imaging analysis is used, then measurement simplicity is improved, but prediction accuracy of treatment success deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement simplicityVSAvoidprediction accuracy of treatment success
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple types of heart data (anatomical imaging, voltage mapping, rhythm analysis) into a comprehensive dataset that feeds into machine learning models, combining multiple measurement modalities to achieve superior prediction accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning models serve as intermediaries that process and integrate complex multi-dimensional heart features, transforming raw imaging and measurement data into actionable predictions about treatment success probability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If machine learning models with multiple heart features are used, then prediction accuracy of treatment success is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracy of treatment successVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex analysis task into distinct components handled by different machine learning models - one model for anatomical features, another for voltage features, and another for rhythm features, with each model specializing in a specific type of analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250014763A1Advanced atrial fibrillation treatment system and method utilizing crowdsourced machine learning models
Publication Date: 2025.01.09 BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD
  • US20250014763A1 patent drawing
  • US20250014763A1 patent drawing
  • US20250014763A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The presently disclosed subject matter includes computer methods and computer systems that enable to select and provide a suitable treatment for AF patients that increases the likelihood of long-term amelioration of AF conditions, and thereby enhances treatment of AF patients. The disclosure provides methods and systems for analysis of the condition of AF patients and the tailoring of personalized treatment regimens based on various AF features obtained from the patients, and the determination of a treatment selected from at least PVI only and PVI plus. To overcome technical difficulties resulting from scarcity of data a machine learning model that is trained using physician recommendation rather than observed treatment outcome is disclosed.