Machine Learning Benchmarking Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Benchmarking in distributed systems is time-consuming due to the need to adjust and test multiple parameters, which increases costs and resource usage.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a machine learning-based system that learns from past benchmark data to recommend optimal configuration settings for current or future benchmarking tasks, utilizing reinforcement learning and multi-objective optimization to reduce the time and resources required for benchmarking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple parameters are adjusted and tested during benchmarking, then benchmarking accuracy is improved, but benchmarking time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebenchmarking accuracyVSAvoidbenchmarking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by using reinforcement learning to predict optimal benchmarking parameters before actual benchmarking begins. The RL model learns from historical benchmarking data and pre-determines which parameters should be tested and at what values, eliminating the need to exhaustively test all possible parameter combinations and thereby reducing benchmarking time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting benchmarking parameters based on reinforcement learning predictions. Instead of testing all parameters systematically, the RL model identifies the most impactful parameters and their optimal values, changing the benchmarking approach from comprehensive parameter sweeping to targeted parameter selection, thus reducing time while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If comprehensive benchmarking is performed to test all configurations, then benchmarking reliability is improved, but resource usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebenchmarking reliabilityVSAvoidresource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential benchmarking configurations that need to be tested, rather than performing comprehensive benchmarking on all possible configurations. The reinforcement learning model identifies and extracts the most critical parameter combinations from historical data, allowing the system to achieve reliable benchmarking results with significantly reduced resource consumption by focusing only on the most impactful test cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by performing benchmarking on a selected subset of configurations rather than all possible configurations. The reinforcement learning model determines which partial set of benchmarking tasks will provide the most reliable results, allowing the system to achieve sufficient benchmarking reliability without the excessive resource usage that would result from testing every possible configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If multiple different parameters are adjusted and tested, then benchmarking thoroughness is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebenchmarking thoroughnessVSAvoidbenchmarking cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by using reinforcement learning to learn from historical benchmarking results and continuously improve parameter selection. The RL model receives feedback from past benchmarking outcomes and adjusts its predictions for future benchmarking tasks, enabling the system to achieve thorough benchmarking with optimized parameter selection that reduces unnecessary testing and thereby lowers costs while maintaining benchmarking quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11789781B1Load generation for benchmarking
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US11789781B1 patent drawing
  • US11789781B1 patent drawing
  • US11789781B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Operating settings for a benchmarking operation may be determined, based at least in part, on one or more benchmarking task parameters. The operating settings may be used to establish a set of worker resources to send requests against a target until a stop condition is valid. Data may be collected from the target and used to train one or more machine learning systems in order to provide improved operating setting recommendations for subsequent benchmarking tasks.